User talk:Konig Des Todes

From Guild Wars 2 Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Wednesday
February

26

2020
Archives


Trouble at the Roots enemies[edit]

As per the recently agreed-upon description of what phantasms should be in this game, none of the creature enemies seen during this instance fit it so if you could please stop labeling them as such, that would be great. In my mind, a live hallucination somewhat fits the page if we include visions taking place in the present but if the consensus does not, all pages unique to that instance should be deleted then since they wouldn't fit anything we have, made-up or not. 70.82.113.198 03:57, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

They're not memories, which are echoes of past events. Memories will never react to the player. And those hallucinations attack the player. They may not fit phantasms perfectly well (TBH, we can't say what that drug was, maybe there was mesmer magic in it), but it fits far more than memories. Furthermore, in the core game, phantasms always have a purple transparent look... just like those NPCs (except for the bugged out oozes).
Either way, I'm not gonna fight you over it, do whatever you want. Konig (talk) 03:59, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
You're the one who hammered on the "past-only" (even though Light in the Darkness exists) and "no reaction" angles onto the page so that's up to you to decide if you want to "fight" me on this. Either way, I think Memory as in Hallucination fits much more for these than Phantasm at this point. 70.82.113.198 04:03, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
I did add that to the article, because you just made the article and it isn't complete. I mean, the very reason why they're called memories is because they're representations of past events. That's why the term was chosen to depict these types of NPCs.
And it should be noted that you're just repeating the same issue that began the discussion on Talk:Phantasm (race) in the first place. You labeled every NPC with unclear origins as phantasms, and now you're just relabeling them all as memories. That's not what was agreed on. Konig (talk) 04:26, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Apart from the enemies that caused this discussion, which are more ambiguous, all the NPCs on the page right now are seen as/during visions, unless you'd like to provide examples for the claim you just made. If the past-only aspect is that important to you, the page could always be renamed to 'Vision' to be more broad, which would suit me fine. 70.82.113.198 04:30, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
That's largely because I had already moved some you had altered (e.g., [1] and [2]) and you didn't further dispute it unlike these, leaving just these four. And the more important part is that memories - or visions, name does not matter one bit so long as it is remotely accurate - are non-interactive with the modern environment. Those drunken hallucinations that are visually identical to core phantasms (e.g., transparent purple), do interact. That's the key thing. Interaction and reaction. Konig (talk) 20:47, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Concepts arts on my user page about possible expansion.[edit]

I read your message, thanks for giving me the tips. I redid gw2 wiki already existing ones.

All of the others are GW1 concept arts and so the code don't work for them (have to keep my uploaded ones). Tell me if you see one that need to be changed.

File:User Ezrielia QuoraSum.jpg,File:User Ezrielia RuinFores.jpg,File:User Ezrielia FracWall.jpg,File:User Ezrielia ArtEun1.jpg,File:User Ezrielia ArtEun2.jpg,File:User Ezrielia AmphRuin.jpg are now tagged for deletion.

About the reason of why i haven't used the original concept art and resized them, it's because I've found them on several artworks/concept arts websites and wasn't aware we had them so sorry. Haven't made it on purpose.


--Inquest Overseer Ezrielia (talk) 10:40, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Hey, no worries about it, we can't know it all. :) By the way, it is technically against rules to remove talk page comments (nvm, I saw just now that you merely archived it - would be best to archive after a short period for discussion though), and a single conversation is best kept in one location. It would have been fine if you replied on your own talk page in the section I made. Anyways, cheers!
As to concept art that's not uploaded - always feel free to upload it under the mainspace yourself! It's fine if you accidentally upload a duplicate - if the image is the exact same, then you'll get an error notice before you can actually upload, and if you happen to find a larger version, that's all the better. If you happen to come across more concept art you want to upload, I wrote up a brief guide to help myself here a while back. Konig (talk) 15:16, 14 January 2020 (UTC)