User talk:Kiomadoushi

I also have a GW1 talk page, feel free to look at it or to visit my GW1 user page.

Repetitive? Yes. Redundant? Still yes.

So here we go again, a page on the GW2 wiki... At this point, its all thought and speculation... But I think I'm going to be happy with what Guild Wars 2 has to offer. I'm really looking into the Elementalist, as that's just who I am (thinking Sylvari Ele...) and considering Queen Jennah is a Mesmer, as Dougal Keane is a Thief, I'm sure Mesmer will be a playable profession too, which has me thinking Asura Mesmer as a character I'd like to play. A summery Sylvari, and an Asura from the college of synergetics. I guess when it comes out, I'll end up saying this stuff again... xD ~~ Kiomadoushi 02:09, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

"Dougal Keane is a Thief" Come again? He hardly resembles a theif imo. Then again, I personally don't think he has a profession. Same with Ember, who's more thief-like that Keane (even Ash Legion). Dougal is more of a ranger-without-a-pet, but mechanics have no influence on lore so yay pointless comments! Konig/talk 03:05, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

It's so obvious... Even look to his name... Names are always so indicative of identity... Like Aurica the Oracle, or Ginny the Djinni, or... John Smith, son of a blacksmith... Dougal Keane, "Dark Stranger" "Fighter"... That was no coincidence. =/ ~~ Kiomadoushi 03:11, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

I like how two of those names come from a flash RPG shooter game called Starwish. I wouldn't use those two names as examples, as that game was filled with puns, including Ginny's. Also "the Oracle" and "the Djinni" were not names but titles (also, Ginny was a Djinni not called Djinni - say that five times fast!).

To counter your point on Dougal's name: I present to you, Killeen, aka "bright-headed" - such a meaning, if used to define profession, would imply something more light-of-day orientated, rather than a Necromancer. In both scenarios, their names hint to their personality, rather than what they do. Dougal is a dark stranger due to his past, which caused him to brood and in turn abandon those who knew him (perhaps even is the cause for him becoming a mercenary, and if you read his motto at the beginning: never become attached to those you work with; thus furthers the stranger mentality), and he fights (or rather, have had a life of fighting his whole life) and is a bit of a strategist at some points (though not an active one). A thief is dark, but not a stranger. Konig/talk 03:19, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Okay, yes they're from Starwish, but that's because I figured you'd see the ties, and they appear like that in a LOT of games and books and movies... like Sora means sky, Kairi means dissociation/separation/estrangement, and Riku means land/shore. Just as Sora is a free spirit, Riku is grounded and the exact opposite of Sora, while Kairi is lost with her heart separated from her body... And then there's Morpheus ("He who shapes") and Neo ("New" or "Gift") which I'm sure you know the Matrix well enough to figure out those... And then family names do that too, and you hear about stuff like that all the time. And thieves do get strangerly around people, trying to keep their darker line of work hidden... Sure, those are personalities, but possible due to stereotype as all names that work like that are... Sylvari seek knowledge and understanding, and thieves keep themselves as dark strangers to others ~~ Kiomadoushi 03:38, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

You're only supporting my point more, tbh - the meaning of names in literature tend to describe one's personality, not what they do for a living. Not to say the latter are non-existent, but that the former is more often; those of the latter which are existent, tend to be more direct. Like your Smith example. Konig/talk 03:44, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

No no no, you missed it. Not personalities; STEREOTYPES. That's what they always are... This is this, and that is that, and A is A, and B is B... personality just fits among those lines of stereotypes. Like Deuce in starwish is 2nd-in-command, and as pirate-overlord, he is named "Deus", again another stereotype... Overlord = godlike ~~ Kiomadoushi 03:50, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Minor correction: Names relate to personalities, and the personalities you list are stereotypes. The names are not the stereotypes, but hint towards stereotypes being used (or in the example, the pun of a name). It is possible to have a name hint towards a personality without the personality being a stereotype. Konig/talk 03:59, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

well then i concede to you, but i still hold my view on dougal. ~~ Kiomadoushi 04:10, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

(Reset indent) "A summery Sylvari, and an Asura from the college of synergetics. I guess when it comes out, I'll end up saying this stuff again... xD" hey look, i'm still saying it!... xD still repetitive and redundant. i love commenting on myself. ftw! ~~ Kiomadoushi 07:08, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Template:Hide

....Whatcha doin? I'm a bit confused. 02:55, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

lol wow, its already been found? well, I'm trying to give it more customization, and I keep finding ways to improve it to make it more useful, like to make a custom hiding bar, while keeping it relatively simple (with the content and header parameters, which just made me think, should they be labeled parameters as text/header? or keep text to automatic, and allow you to change what the header says with header=?)

go ahead and tell me if you find something wrong with it, like its too complex (which it shouldn't be cos nothing's mandatory), or its missing something ~~ Kiomadoushi 04:20, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

It's quite nice actually. I just saw the redirect on Template:Hide and then the User:Kiomadoushi/Template:Hide and Kiomadoushi/Template:Hide pages and was trying to figure out what the goal of it was. You may have to move the last mentioned page (Kiomadoushi/Template:Hide) as all pages that belong in the Userspace should begin with User: but other than that nice job! 04:27, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

thanks, and I kinda noticed that... I was just like "oh wait. that's not on the new pages list cos its not 'user:' first? o.o" i'll get on that in a sec xD and seriously, if you find any ways to make it better, go ahead and tell me! ~~ Kiomadoushi 04:29, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Hey

Tnx for welcoming me to the Wiki and look. I even managed to make a signature :D. --Regent 10:19, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Hiya

You mentioned you noticed similarities between my chars. story and your chars. story. I decided you might want to read the full story, so I'm redirecting you to [[User:Necro Shea mo/Charstories/Necromancer Shea Mo|Shea's Story]]. It's not fully posted yet, but I intend to do that very soon!!!-- Necro Shea Mo 02:19, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thanks for fix'n that!!! (you should add it to your page! That's what it's for!)-- Necro Shea Mo 04:46, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Yah X2-- Necro Shea Mo 05:01, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

i'm actually just got that right now... i put the userbox in the Marred Illusions tab, plus a little link in the guild spot ( [[User:Necro Shea mo/Культ мертвых|Культ мертвых]] ). xD ~~ Kiomadoushi 05:05, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Didn't catch the link!-- Necro Shea Mo 05:06, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

in shew's character template, for the character ( | guild = )... that's where i put it ~~ Kiomadoushi 05:09, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Eye sea.-- Necro Shea Mo 05:11, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Abouth Death Shroud

If you think I'm trolling, you should be careful about it. It is a discussion about the mechanic, prove your point and I will accept it. 87.97.0.187 18:49, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

I did, but you're just a troll. It's CLEARLY visible that life force is used for health, energy, and even time while in death shroud. This was stated before, is known as truth now, and is visible in the video. Also, DO NOT POST ON MY TALK PAGE UNLESS YOU WISH TO REGISTER FIRST. You are trolling, and there is another user who agrees that you are wrong. Let's just see what the admins have to say... ~~ Kiomadoushi 18:52, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Did you play with the recent demo? If don't, I don't have to beleive what you think about a mechanic that is constantly under development. 87.97.0.187 18:57, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

See my post on Talk:Death Shroud. Both of you. Aqua (T|C) 19:04, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

I will accept your apology whenever you ready, I won't comment here further. 87.97.0.187 19:41, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

fyi

i left u a message on gw1wiki --Icyyy Blue 19:21, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

I could be wrong

But I'm relatively sure that one thing the admins do not like is registered users discriminating against anonymous users because they edit without an account. ("Also, DO NOT POST ON MY TALK PAGE UNLESS YOU WISH TO REGISTER FIRST.")
Also, if anyone is trolling/stirring up drama (be it intentionally or otherwise), it is you, and I highly recommend that you calm down, and if you can't calm down while the discussion is going, take a brief break from the wiki. It's not like it's going anywhere. Aqua (T|C) 19:41, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

IPs can change quite a bit (and note that his contributions are only limited to today). I have no problem with static IP users, but when someone's IP changes, I don't want it on my talk page. That's nearly as bad as not signing at all. It's also the reason I dislike 4chan - talking anonymously makes what you have to say hold little meaning behind it because there is little proof that the person is confident in their ability to speak. I find it less of an issue on other talk spaces, and generally a non-issue on edits (unless its drastic, and they give no credit, then its like: are you serious, or just vandalizing?) but I don't want anonymous users - ones hiding themselves - talking so freely on my talk space because then that's like a person hiding behind a locked door trying to talk to me. ~~ Kiomadoushi 23:20, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

To be honest, the registered users are just as anonymous unless they specify themselves in their many, many ways. I do see your point though, but I also think it would be a tactical approach to always remain civil and focussed on the content you discuss, rather than the contributors editting (registration aside). You don't want to get on the bad side of certain seated admins. - Infinite - talk 14:49, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

As Infinite said, you know about the same amount about me (or Infinite, or anyone) as you do any random IP who edits your talk page. The only difference is I managed to make my way through the brief registration process. That really shouldn't make me anymore qualified to write on your talk page than anyone else.

I guess your opinion is your opinion, but I would keep it mostly to yourself if I were you; certain admins here really don't like aggressive behavior towards anons because their anons. Aqua (T|C) 16:42, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

@Infinite; Tactical approach? I hope you meant tactful :/ otherwise it sounds like he's planning a war on anons Thering 16:47, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

I usually confuse the two, good catch! Tactful* indeed. :) - Infinite - talk 17:13, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

(Reset indent) I'll repeat that: I have NO problems at all with static IP users who make note of being a certain IP; that's the same as a registered user to me because then they have at least some identity. I have no issue with IP users as far as edits and other talk pages (although the dynamic one-time-edit drastic change without a reputable name behind it and no source is a flag for concern about possible vandalism, and worth questioning cos again, no source, no reputation to back up the claim. I'd sooner trust edits by the username aquadrizzt, infinite, aspectacle, etc, just because of the reputation behind the names made for each). It's the issue of coming to me to talk to me and keeping complete anonymity. Walking into a room with a mask on (registered, static IP) is still more personable than standing outside a room and playing ghost, and so that does give you more ability to come talk to me, as it means i will actually reply to you. Since it wasn't stated earlier, all that really was meant for was:

1. Take note of this message. (caps)
2. I don't want you coming to my talk page to talk if you are going to play the anonymous game - make at least some identity for yourself so its not like talking to a wall or the ceiling.
3. I will not have a conversation with you and will ignore you if you don't comply in that simple courtesy of making yourself known when talking to me in the space used for talking to/with me or for me to notice.

I notice that I didn't say it the most tactful, and did ignore static IP users there, but that's because I was talking specifically to that one person at the time, and wasn't going to explain all of that right then. ~~ Kiomadoushi 18:39, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

>.>

I cant do it saturday(uw) cuz my sister is gunna do her homework but u can get holy to do it for u and dj --Icyyy Blue 18:30, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Well we may just do FoW cos you have that and we don't, that way we're all doing the same stuff together ~~ Kiomadoushi 18:31, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

okay, maybe you can get holy or infi to do that with ya xD--Icyyy Blue 19:44, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Of Gender and Assumption

As to not continue such a conversation on Icyy's page, do not misunderstand me. I neither assumed you male nor female in the beginning. However, I tend to be able to tell people's personality, and at time mood, via their word choice, punctuation, and so forth. I believe this is a side-effect of being an English major and a writer. You write - in which I mean your word choices, style, etc. - more like the typical male, rather than the typical female, hence my surprise, however because I knew that there are always variables or unpredictables in life - I myself am one for if I were to put my own ability to my words, I read nothing but anger and annoyance coming from them 80% of the time - I never assumed such.
I do not tend to go to anyone's userpage unless I am seeking information, and I never cared for whether you were male or female as, to me, that is irrelevant in the grand scale of things. In fact, I knew you were a female just now because I sought that information. Mind you, I was in fact prompted with "don't try them on me," but nonetheless, I meant no offense. And in fact, most of those whom I know well online, and in enjoy(ed) the company of the most, are, fun fact, women.
For your amusement and as an apology, I shall link you to a funny skit which makes an all-too-true point which I wish was non-existent. Enjoy. Konig/talk 03:28, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Oh, and about your sig: 1) I don't look at sigs except to read names, I don't bother looking at colors or icons often. 2) I've seen guys, who at least claim to be straight, use pink very often. 3) I actually didn't realize that was an elephant nor do I realize now why an elephant is relevant to one's gender. Konig/talk 03:29, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

That is far from a masculine elephant, and short cute elephants like that are one of those defining feminine icons, like cute little kittens or a heart or smiley face. Also, I myself am a bit of a linguist (i know a couple of languages very well), and sadly enough, "proper" english, as i've grown to learn it, is generally written in a masculine form (even when gender-neutral), as i'm sure you know as an english major. gender analysts and gender analyzing programs for writing still say i use more feminine word choice than masculine, but it's still a fair balance. it works; i'm used to it; it's "proper"... that's what i use then (usually) ~~ Kiomadoushi 03:46, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

With some folks, I have a hard enough time telling if they are male or female in real life! And this is much harder on a wiki. Personally, i think more guys play video games (thus help with the wiki) than girls. So I assume everyone is a male, unless they tell me other wise. Im a married male w/kids and use pink in my sig, so I don't even take sigs into consideration. --Moto Saxon 03:58, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

I've never once said the elephant is masculine. In fact, due to its size I didn't even realize it was an elephant until you told me it was. Cute is subjective (and often used to comedic effects at times because of such) and short is mostly cuz it's so small - it's no shorter than it is wider with how tiny it is. And I've never heard of an elephant, of any kind, being used for any kind of gender icon, tbh.

Unlike Saxon, I don't assume a gender to people until I've heard such or am highly convinced through one's use of words and punctuation. You (Kio) are correct when "proper" English has a more masculine overall feel to it, which is sad imo especially when I look at other languages. But if I ever assumed you male, it was not due to you being online, but due to word use, punctuation, and attitude I feel when I read your comments. Which, tbh, most of the time gives me the vibe of someone who's proud of themselves - and not in a bad light, so don't confuse that. And such a vibe tends to come from men more than women - something else I feel is a side-effect of our culture. Konig/talk 04:05, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Actually, real ratios is closer to half than 60/40 male/female even... I think it's like 56% male? Of course, there are games that are dominated by boys (like WoW, or Killzone or Counterstrike or other shooters) just because it IS all boys, and most of the girls don't want to play surrounded by all the boys. I really don't care if all the girl characters in Guild Wars are actual girls, it just makes me not feel alone and estranged. I mean, it's only Icyyy and me who are active on the wiki, and that's discouraging, as I'm sure you can imagine... It's like, what if Barbie Dream World were an MMO, and was fun enough and somewhat gender-neutral enough for boys to play (as Kens) - how many would you find when it's so clearly dominated by girls, and the boys would feel estranged? ~~ Kiomadoushi 04:10, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

edit and now with an edit in there that wasn't there, cos for some reason it didn't edit conflict... Konig, my only pride is that i CAN stand in a gaming world, and possibly be equal or better than the boys, cos in real life, that doesn't happen - i have nothing besides games to feel good about... I can't even cook well. =/ My self esteem is so little that online and in games, i CAN have that pride added in! i try to make a stand for all the girl gamers who get shoved aside just for being girls... You would never see me as assertive offline as I am online. like... ever. ~~ Kiomadoushi 04:15, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

edit2 on a somewhat unrelated note, having to do with gender-based word choices, "to" is one of those masculine words, as well as "the" and "a" and "an", all of which are words that english would not work without. that's how a lot of english is... the necessary words to tie together subject and predicate with ease are "masculine". carefully chosen, fluid, visual words that take an eternity to state what is to be said are generally "feminine"... If you are surrounded by boys, or you are in a professional environment, you are forced to use those simple words, or else branded negatively for being too creative or too imprecise. in short, I Hate English. ~~ Kiomadoushi 04:29, 7 July 2011 (UTC) (with a passion. >=/)

Well to clear up any future misconception: I enjoy women's company, be it on game's or not, far more than I could ever enjoy other guy's company. I'm that kind of guy who can't enjoy any sort of "guy's night." Just not me. Likewise, I find game communities - both company and players - would improve with a more equal gender ratio. And don't misunderstand that comment, please, as I'm not saying there aren't a lot of women on the internet, but that their not vocal enough. Rather than going on and on, I think this video summarizes my thoughts on the topic well - as do many of that group's other videos.

On another note: I find it hard to believe that the only thing you do good is related to games. Everyone has multiple strengths and weaknesses, many positive and negative aspects, so I can't agree to you saying you have one of one side, and many of the other. And I know a lot of women who can't cook (my sister is one among many) so I fail to see how that's relevant. Konig/talk 04:48, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

I too enjoy hitting on internet girls. 05:21, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Im good at analyzing people and seeing through people ;) <- if that was a job(that paid good) id so take it xD! and Konig I never talked to you in-game like everyone on the wiki that seemed to have me on their fl before i had them o.O --Icyyy Blue 05:54, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Felix, I think you need to remove that "too." Icyy, that actually is a job. It's called profiling. Requires lots of psychology classes and degrees to get into though. Typically for police forces (of various branches) for hunting down wanted criminals - anticipate what the person will do. Konig/talk 07:50, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, I think any normal/mature human being/gamer/wiki contributer isn't really bothered by the sex of other gamers. For me, it's about the quality of the community, having a good time and getting the job done. I'm glad you've found a community/place that helps boost your self esteem. I've actually found that helping with the wiki and working through disagreements on here have help me become a little more vocal and factual in RL relationships. So I hope it also has a positive effect on you as well. And you said you were trying to make a stand for female gamers/wiki users...but remember, not everyone online is worth trying to have a good rapport with. Some people are just immature and angry at the world that aren't worth the time. Just be yourself (which I believe you are) and you'll attract the right kind of people to you. --Moto Saxon 12:46, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

The userboxes weren't conclusive enough? :L - Infinite - talk 13:20, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

For the record, I check user spaces, and the user box was enough for me. But if a user space does not declare a gender, then in my mind I assume it's a male (which has no effect on how i treat them) until told otherwise. And that's all I was chirping in to say. --Moto Saxon 13:31, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Ah, I see. :) - Infinite - talk 13:48, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

(Reset indent) three things.
@Felix, I guessed YOU would say something like that, and that made me lol xD.
@Konig, it really is my only strength. I can think in systems, not just linear thoughts, so I'm good at games and electronic stuff cos I can think all around it before doing anything. Helps me watch for careful jumps in platformers; helps me think about what people are where so I can avoid their fire and shoot them first (in shooters, obviously); helps me think about all the tasks i'm doing and think about entire maps and how they all link from place to place (multiple paths) in adventure games... That's like my only strength, and it makes me terrible for a housewife (which i'd like to be the house-cleaning, dinner-cooking, child-raising homemaker mother from like the 50s and 60s...) and terrible at living alone. And I do have a LOT of weaknesses.
@Infi, I'm not making a stand for the wiki users (it's just discouraging that the only other girl on here is Icyyy - no offense - and i wish there were more). I try to make a stand for girl gamers because as much as girls play games - and are good at games, often just as skilled, sometimes far better - most boys still constantly voice how much better boys are at a bunch of stuff, and it being the only thing i'm good with, that really, truly irks me. I don't care who's better at wikis. xD ~~ Kiomadoushi 22:15, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Guys just love to pretend to be better at games. Alpha male syndrome and stuff. I guess this is why I like them so much, because it's adorable (I never thought I would use the word, even). Gamer chicks rule. One of my best friends is one and she's like "DIE DIE DIE!" all day everyday when gaming. - Infinite - talk 08:48, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Guys love to pretend to be better at a lot of things, accepting that is just life... But she sounds like a bundle of fun. Just ask my boyfriend, he'll tell you how fiery I get when it comes to my games. >=3 ~~ Kiomadoushi 18:09, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Your boyfriend is one lucky bastard. Just saying. Konig/talk 20:55, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

u can just ask me how she gets when she plays GW lol xD, not like its bad or anything --Icyyy Blue 08:45, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

"BURN! BURN! FIRE! DIEEE!!! BWAHAHAHAAA!! Stupid Ice Elementals..."

"Aww, look at the moas... They're so cute. Let's burn them! =3"

"I love my nukes... <3 So much burning and death... Yeyz"

Just a few things I say pretty often... And would probably be my battle quotes if i were a hero. ~~ Kiomadoushi 13:53, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Glad you aren't one than:P Hard enough time getting Koss and Melonni to shut up... (Link is not working :b I give up on the link...)-- Necro Shea Mo 20:33, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Fixed your link. Konig/talk 20:58, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Thank you. I really couldn't figure it out..... Oh... and now I see why.... (I forgot this is the GW2W, not the GWW)-- Necro Shea Mo 02:20, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

IP posting

A couple days back I was on a bad computer that only had internet explorer with some really bad settings not allowing me to log in and stay logged in. IP number was like 4.something.blah.blah... Anyways, those 2 posts or so link here, and are me. Just mentioning ^.~ ~~ Kiomadoushi 20:01, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

WoC

Are u guys gunna do WoC? lol ur never on xD--Angelkiss 20:42, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Sorry! Been really busy lately... I know I am, but I'm not sure about DJ, I think he wanted to clear WiK before starting WoC... ~~ Kiomadoushi 23:20, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

ahh well i just finished WiK so ;P i might wait and do WoC with u guys --Angelkiss 11:01, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Guild xD

I think your boyfriend is still the guild leader after GW updated the crap...I don't get on anymore lmao! Busyy! So if you guys ever start WoC tell me, I might be able to get on.(just not after midnight xD) --Angelkiss 08:37, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Marred Illusions

Heya. :) I love that name! A F K When Needed 03:39, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Happy Birthday :o

~ MayaGoesRawr! 14:30, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!-- Necro Shea Mo 19:13, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Happy B-day ^^ (srry I'm late) --The Holy Dragons 19:23, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Lol, be late all you want... I was busy working my butt off. =/ Thanks peoples <3 ~~ Kiomadoushi 03:42, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Guild Userbox

Sorry the user box is out-of-order. I'm moving everything into latin characters (vs. the Cyrillic ones) so people can type links w/out copying and pasting in cyrillic ones... It should be fixed soon.-- Necro Shea Mo 04:03, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Moved user box to a new page: User:Necro Shea mo/K'ult Mertvyh/Userbox-- Necro Shea Mo 21:29, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Traits and lists

Since you are working on traits, would you like to participate in a discussion about how we display them at Template talk:Trait table‎‎ ? --JonTheMon 19:50, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Skill tiers table

Thanks for a great job, but I have a couple of suggestions. 1st of all, we now have templates like {{Damage}} to add icons (like this:  Damage), so aligning 1st colunm to the left would look way better (icons will be right under each other). I'd also remove fixed width from the 1st column, as text sometimes doesn't fit in it. And one more thing: Level Tier looks somewhat strange to me, I think Tier by itself is enough. Alfa-R 17:34, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Right, will get on that... ~~ Kiomadoushi 23:00, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Template:Otheruses

I undid your edit there because we already have [[Template:Otheruses 2]] which allows for a second alternate link. Of course, it might be a good idea for us to merge those two templates, but for now, there's no need to have two templates that do the same thing. —Dr Ishmael 21:55, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

How right you are. 6 pages that use it, so it's easier to replace them with the updated otheruses, than use otheruses 2 ~~ Kiomadoushi 23:19, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Template:Personal storyline infobox

Lots of personal story info became "broken" because the background output was inside the if-conditional of order. I've moved the order parameter after background as a quick crude fix. I wasn't too sure about the parameter combination and the output. BryghtShadow 06:04, 7 September 2012 (UTC)