User talk:Ge4ce
Hey[edit]
Welcome to the wiki, Ge4ce ^^. I've checked out what's wrong with the references on the Earth Attunement page, but I can't seem to fix it either o_0. Ahh, time will tell. --Naoroji 10:36, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
Your last comment on my userpage[edit]
Please don't feel discouraged from contributing D: All I was saying is; if it hasn't come from ANet's mouth, it's speculation. If it's speculation, we can't (shouldn't) document it, since this is an encyclopedia, after all. Please, it was in no way annoying or a problem because it 'came from you'. Everyone's opinions & contributions are as important as everyone else's; your opinion is as valuable as Pling's is ;). --Naoroji 13:54, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
- Speculation hurts. Though speculaas is very tasty. And you know it. ge4ce 15:16, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
- Pling has no opinion, only fact. Eive 15:38, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
Aura of Restoration[edit]
See... the problem is the caster does have a gender. I know it's kind of an awkward sentence but it is correct. I would like to change it back to my version.~ Bow 01:46, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
- How about a compromise, and make it: "It has the effect of healing the player every time when using a skill." It is pretty weird to have 'he or she' there, seeing how we should then change that on every other skill page. Seeing how a 'warrior', 'elementalist' or 'ranger' can be a he, or she. Not to mention that some articles (caster, no 'gender', no 'gender', caster, 'warrior', 'your', 'warrior', no 'gender', 'user', no 'gender' etc. etc. etc.) do not mention 'he or she'. Not to forget that a 'crowd of people' are still a bunch of humans who are either male or female. And yeah, 'it'... could be anything. ge4ce 05:23, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
- Lol it's so complicated for such a minor thing. Can I change your suggestion a little to "It has the effect of healing the caster every time when using a skill." I still don't really think thats the best it can be but it's alright.~ Bow 00:47, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
A pure random question[edit]
What's better: ==title== or == title ==. I found myself to use the first one often, while sometimes seeing the second one around. Both do the exact same thing... I guess it doesn't really matter? ge4ce 11:41, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
- it doesn't make a difference. --The Holy Dragons 12:10, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
Website note[edit]
IGN <> ING Only the latter is a bank. :) - Infinite - talk 18:15, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
- Ohhh, haha. But still! There might be some type-o-holics who did ing instead of ign! I would have never noticed it myself. :D ge4ce 18:17, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
That should nearly cover most of the pages. Could have been done faster with bots and such... probably. Oh, well. ge4ce 09:02, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
Ohoho[edit]
Guts on RC, I like it! - Infinite - talk 04:50, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
The time to remove some references?[edit]
I've got a feeling that references have lost a lot of their meaning cause they are referring to facts from the actual Guild Wars 2 website. We could safely remove them, can we? Ge4ce-Talk-Contribs 13:05, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- For well established facts, I don't see a reason to keep references around. For newly released stuff, I'd still like to throw up a reference so that people can verify the information for themselves. --Sirrush 13:17, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, just make sure that the references that you remove can be cross referenced (and therefore made obsolete) before you remove them. Actually that's pretty much what Sirrush said. (Xu Davella 13:53, 5 March 2011 (UTC))
Superior vs Major vs Minor[edit]
As far as we know, there are only two trait types; major and minor. Superior <Attribute> are major traits, whereas Major <Attribute> and Minor <Attribute> are minor. Do you have a source for there being superior, major and minor trait slots? Aqua (T|C) 17:34, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
- I have none. It's sort of sad to see how half assed(?) we(?) have to work hear into 'cleaning up' 'information' that is subject to change in all kinds of ways. Having to add, delete or edit it unsure that it still stays a fact after a day,week,month or perhaps a year. (Although I might be rambling a bit here, it is a bit satisfying to just type it down.) My edits are seen as 'making up', I someone do and do not mind that, seeing how there is simply no source. But that makes me wonder why some missing 'obvious/ordinary/normal' information has not been 'confirmed'. We are sort of left here, to work on a speculative wiki (even with facts entwined within) that perhaps in the end is totally not what we had hoped this wiki to be.
- I was somehow hoping to find something to do, not just to pass time, that would have some sort of impact, importance or impression. Though that may sound like rambling seeing the few things that I have done. If only they would have released more information on the DES... ... Thank you for the message, by the way. Ge4ce-Talk-Contribs 08:26, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
- Except what we display on here is all confirmed, at least in mainspace. On userspace, you can say whatever you want. We were told how traits work, we were given example traits. Major and Minor are comparative for the purpose of how many you can have per line. A major trait is limited to 1 each line as they have such high power to them. A minor trait is generally limited in use, so you can have multiples (ele's can have up to 4, others up to 2) per line. You have to go around to seek out traits, performing acts or visiting hidden locations or doing events, etc, just to earn them. A "Major" and "Minor" attribute trait are both minor because they hold minimal effect (+10 and +25), while the "Superior" attribute is high-powered, at +75, so it is categorized as a major trait. We were told this stuff and that's why it's documented on their respective pages. This is not a speculative wiki; it's all what is known. Look at the Mesmer page and tell me it's filled with speculation (that's the hottest speculation debate right now). We do not list assumed or insinuated information because it is not confirmed truth. When things change, we document change as a history of truths. I'm sorry if hearing any of that hurts, but it does not belong on the wiki otherwise. ~~ Kiomadoushi 17:53, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you for the explanation.
- The game has yet to be released. Giving the confirmed information we place here a somewhat other meaning. There has already been many changes brought to the demo. (Demo being a free incomplete demonstrative version for an upcoming game, as we know. Unlike other games *cough* Zynga *cough*) But like I said before; I'm hoping that Anet considers to confirm or explain more stuff as we go. Cause basically, this is a wiki that has all the data that can already be seen in interviews, videos, forums and articles. This isn't bad, but the actual content is still (somewhat) missing. I'm a bit nitpicky on this, but on a totally other note, I want to state that we do here is not wasted. The preparations we're making will be of great use when we can play the released version of the game. And we know that a wiki will definitely shine then. Looking forward to see all the changes happening. Ge4ce-Talk-Contribs 08:12, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
- Except what we display on here is all confirmed, at least in mainspace. On userspace, you can say whatever you want. We were told how traits work, we were given example traits. Major and Minor are comparative for the purpose of how many you can have per line. A major trait is limited to 1 each line as they have such high power to them. A minor trait is generally limited in use, so you can have multiples (ele's can have up to 4, others up to 2) per line. You have to go around to seek out traits, performing acts or visiting hidden locations or doing events, etc, just to earn them. A "Major" and "Minor" attribute trait are both minor because they hold minimal effect (+10 and +25), while the "Superior" attribute is high-powered, at +75, so it is categorized as a major trait. We were told this stuff and that's why it's documented on their respective pages. This is not a speculative wiki; it's all what is known. Look at the Mesmer page and tell me it's filled with speculation (that's the hottest speculation debate right now). We do not list assumed or insinuated information because it is not confirmed truth. When things change, we document change as a history of truths. I'm sorry if hearing any of that hurts, but it does not belong on the wiki otherwise. ~~ Kiomadoushi 17:53, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
Any chance you remember...[edit]
Rumors of Trouble you put as part of the norn instinct storyline, however I've heard that one ending at The Wolf Havroun - so do you know which past regret (fight, lost heirloom, blacked out) the character who had Rumors of Trouble had? Konig/talk 22:16, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Sadly no, I do not know. I wasn't the one who added the norn instinct part, it was the IP. I had the stuff from the actual game play video, not char creation. That I do remember. Ge4ce-Talk-Contribs 17:28, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
Wiki event[edit]
You said the proposal at the end of June would work for you. Is this still the case? If not, please propose some additional dates to find out if we can have more users attend the event. :) - Infinite - talk 21:45, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Ovada[edit]
A citation's been requested on the Wiki notes for the latest update, so could you please upload that screenshot and link it there? Thank you! 20:13, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
- http://postimg.org/image/emxfhkuaz/ Ge4ce-Talk-Contribs 09:18, 29 May 2013 (UTC)