User talk:Marcopolo47

Hullo, nice to see you here at the official GW2 wiki :P -- br12 • (talk) • 22:57, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

lol yup. And no GW2W:SIGN yet, so my signature is good for now. :P-- (Talk) (Contr.) 22:58, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

It'll be the same over at the GWW, so if you change it there/here, it'll be the same here/there too, so don't sign there :P If that makes sense. -- br12 • (talk) • 23:00, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Orelly? Cuz when I went to my preferences, it had the default link on it, instead of the signature i used at GWW.-- (Talk) (Contr.) 23:00, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

You sure? Cos I just changed mine here and it was the same over there. Then I changed it there, and it became identical over here. Hmm... -- br12 • (talk) • 23:03, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Ahh you're right. That's stupid, considering there's different sig policies on each wiki.-- (Talk) (Contr.) 23:04, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Discussion's going on at Guild Wars 2 Wiki talk:Sign your comments about that issue. -- br12 • (talk) • 23:06, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Ehh, I hope the sig policy will be closer to GW's than GWW's, cuz GWW's is too strict.-- (Talk) (Contr.) 23:09, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

I'm working on it (in that page), show some support you faggot (damn NPA).reanor 23:58, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

What NPA? Calor (t) 00:31, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

GW2W:POLICY says we are currently bound by GWW:NPA.reanor 01:05, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Also says that we can ignore it since nothing is officially policy. -- br12 • (talk) • 15:59, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Sig

New Sig testing for it to work on both wikis.--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 04:03, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Advice: keep the other one, this one sucks. Dragnmn talk cont 16:37, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Yea, but the other one isn't allowed by strict GWW standards, and since GW2W and GWW share preferences (when you change it on one wiki, it changes on the other), I can't keep a different sig for this wiki.--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 16:39, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Eww

You have terrible taste in music =( — Skakid HoHoHo 16:59, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

LOL--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 17:00, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Fall Out Boy (before they went mainstream) was the gayest thing I've ever heard in my life =( — Skakid HoHoHo 17:01, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Before "From Under the Cork Tree", Fall Out Boy was actually decent.--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 17:06, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

lolwut? — Skakid HoHoHo 17:08, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Before the album with "Dance, Dance" and "Sugar, We're Going Down," Fall Out Boy was a good band.--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 17:11, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

lolwut? — Skakid HoHoHo 17:12, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

EDIT: Rise Against is good. — Skakid HoHoHo 17:12, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Danke je.--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 17:13, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

For once, I have to agree with that guy.reanor 23:59, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

FoB hit it big with Dance, Dance and From Under the Cork Tree. Before was meh. Calor (t) 00:33, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Yes, but many people are so non-conformist that they can't like big bands. Lord of all tyria 16:00, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

*Raises Hand* I typically don't really like mainstream bands as much as bands no one has ever heard of before.--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 23:08, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

To each their own, I suppose. Calor (t) 01:29, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Anti-Flag is on that list. Therefore, it is a good list. --Edru/QQ 01:37, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Anti-Flag is lol anymore — Skakid HoHoHo 02:01, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

The only song I like on that lis is Good Riddance :D --Ricky 02:10, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Added a disclaimer to the list.--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 02:37, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Are you aware that ALL of those bands are popular mainstream scene shit? — Skakid HoHoHo 04:22, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Forever the Sickest Kids? The Audition? Hit the Lights? The Early November? Slick Shoes? Mae? Logan Square? None of those are mainstream at all. kaythnxbai--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 04:50, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Forever The Sickest Kids were on Warped Tour and have a record deal with a major label. The Audition is relatively unknown, being on an indie label. However, the label's hardly small and has or has had a number of popular groups. In addition, the Audition have had several songs included in video games soundtracks and compilation CDs. Hit the Lights has also been involved in Warped Tour and has torued with numerous popular bands, as well as being recognized by music magazines and is also on a major label. The Early November has also been involved in national tours with popular bands and is on a rather successful label. Slick Shoes has much more indie street cred, so to speak, than the others, having been involved with three different indie labels, although they've also been on Warped Tour. Mae is on Capitol Records. Logan Square may not be mainstream, since they don't have a wikipedia article yet(only a link on a disambig page) and their label seems to not be very big.

In short, skakid's mostly right. I(who've been to a total of one show in my entire life) could name at least 4 bands off the top of my head(only including bands local to my area) that are far less mainstream than any of those. Heh. I could probably name bands that are/were successful that would have at most as much name recognition as those. I don't really know how good most of the music on the list is, because I haven't listened much to most of it, though, so I won't comment on the quality of it. Tbh, all of this anti-mainstream bickering seems like scene poseurism to me. --Edru/QQ 05:15, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

I like good music, doesn't matter who likes it or not =P(I've even enjoyed Against Me!'s New Wave, which everyone QQed over. — Skakid HoHoHo 05:33, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Edru, where I live, there's probably only 1 or 2 other people in my school who have heard of those bands, and that's what I go by.--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 16:18, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

I don't care what type of music you like but for that genre of music those bands are pretty mainstream, besides slick shoes.--Aesthetic

"best?"

Two things about that list; one, it's closer to the bottom 50 bands of all time than the top 50 (imo). And two, saying green day wasn't mainstream from the beginning is flat wrong - all the crap they've ever spewed out has been mainstream - it sounds exactly like crap all the other unskilled "rock bands" put out. Personal preference in music is fine, but none of these bands have any signs of "greatness." A great band would have to have (at minimum!) musical skill and longevity; very few bands on your list have the former, and absolutely none of them have the latter. If this is a list of bands you like, then I have no argument against it; but these are far from the greatest bands ever. /endrant. -Auron 08:15, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

yah, thats the kind of music people take suicide to cuz it fail so much... or i dont know. however i made my own list on my page --Cursed Angel 12:31, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Great. If you don't like it, I don't really give a shit. It's my userpage, it's my opinion. Deal with it.--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 21:58, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

cursed, you have been prwnd!-- FearDrake 00:24, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

wtf? ^Teo^ 00:26, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Cursed wasn't prwnd, auron was--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 04:53, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

I stopped looking at it when I saw that Metallica wasn't even on the list :/ Alot of your list is punk rock though, not metal. --- Raptors / RAAAAAAAAAA!

I hate metal.--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 05:07, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

DEATHMETAL IS FOREVER , HAIL SATAN --Cursed Angel 05:59, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Says the guy saying "Happy Christmas" to everyone. Right.--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 06:05, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

That shit ain't punk. — Skakid HoHoHo 06:20, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

btw where did u find this? --Cursed Angel 06:45, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

From Raptors--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 07:08, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

IZ COOL THERE! SRSLY. -- FearDrake 19:42, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Ska and Auron are correct. —̵SEERINFLOOMES 23:18, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks MP47 I was looking for the top 50 emo trash songs :) -- scourge 23:32, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

One man's trash is another man's gold.--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 23:34, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

There are only like 3 or 4 GOOD bands in your top 50 good bands tbh-needs more metal =)PheNaxKian(T/c) 23:37, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

(Reset indent) Are you fucking high Phen? Every single one of those bands is less than the feces a beetle excretes. None of these bands have made a good song in their lives. —ǥrɩɳsɧƴɖɩđđɭɘş 23:23, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

=O you must be mad man! are you telling me you don't think Blink-182 kick ass?! you fail badly if you think blink-182 is bad.(they're the only one that should be up there though-the others are pretty wank, and the better ones wouldn't be in the top 50 at least....)PheNaxKian(T/c) 23:39, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

more metal imo (rawrawr's ip, probly never making acc etc) 84.9.10.165 14:11, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

I absolutely hate metal. Too obnoxious, without any rythm in my opinion.--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 21:06, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Try Melodic Black/Melodic Death Metal :D It has rythm and stuff liek that. I prefer the "obnoxious" metal though, so I can't recommend you any... BTW: In Flames has some cool songs, and it's rythmic --- -- (s)talkpage 21:14, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Megadeth (anything but Risk is gud), Metallica (Before Cliff snuffs it), BLACK SABBATH (especially before ozzy left), lynyryd Skynyrd (for the free bird) mebbe slayer if you can handle it, iron maiden (before mainstreamin'), Anthrax, Dimmu Borgir (wrooaghhh) and Apocalyptica for something more exotic. Auron wins, MP47's list loses, tbh. Nuclear 7 12:11, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Mmk. It's just a matter of personal opinion, so w/e--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 19:52, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

You said w/e. I declare eternal war on you. ETERNAL! Nuclear 7 20:19, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Err...why?--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 21:31, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Just b/c. Nukleaer VII 21:41, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Very well, then. WWWWWWWAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111ONE--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 21:42, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm bored lol :D

TALK MARCO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111111111111111111111111111111ONEONEONEONEONEONEONEONEONEONEONEONE --Hellbringer(T/C) 14:37, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Fail. Needs more wikicode. Lord of all tyria 14:39, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Pssssh. I would go Spam Pyramid but I want that one template :D. --Hellbringer(T/C) 14:59, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Well...we can start the pyrmaid. Wtf? Calor (t) 20:03, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

no u Lord Belar 20:12, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

no u. Calor (t) 20:24, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

no u Lord Belar 20:25, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

no u Calor (t) 20:31, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

no u --- -- (s)talkpage 20:34, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

no u Lord Belar 20:37, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

no u Calor (t) 21:00, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

no u --Hellbringer(T/C) 21:03, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

no u Lord Belar 21:04, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

no u Hellbringer(T/C) 21:12, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

no u Calor (t) 21:14, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Stop it please. poke | talk 21:28, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

aww Hellbringer(T/C) 21:29, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

bah humbugPheNaxKian(T/c) 21:30, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Ah well Calor (t) 21:32, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

:( Lord Belar 21:36, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Oh darn. —̵SEERINFLOOMES 22:13, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

I am testing my signiature here, just to see if it works on this wiki too. Entrea Sumatae [Talk] 00:16, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

I leave my talk page for a few days, and look what happens!--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 00:17, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Evidently. And also: bleh uploading. Entrea Sumatae [Talk] 00:19, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Neat sig. And Marco, you always miss the fun. Calor (t) 01:35, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Just curious

Do you not just upload your sig image under a GWW compliant name just on principle? I mean, you COULD use your GW sig still... Entrea Sumatae [Talk] 00:20, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Smaller words plz, idk what you're saying.--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 00:21, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Why don't you use your sig pic? Just a protest against GWW's image policies?Entrea Sumatae [Talk] 00:21, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

No. Cuz GWW's gayass policies prevent me from doing so. I was already reprimanded about it, and I don't want the subsequent flamefest that followed to happen again. So I'm using a sig that looks exactly like it, but (for some reason) does not break the policy.--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 00:23, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Just upload your pic to Image:User Marcopolo47 Sig.png and modify your preferences to use that pic. It's a GWW-policy compliant image name. Entrea Sumatae [Talk] 00:25, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

The name's not the problem. For some reason, images can't be any larger than 19x19 px large, making my sig "illegal." Retarded if you ask me.--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 00:29, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Are you serious? WTF?Entrea Sumatae [Talk] 00:32, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

That rule was put in because images larger than 19px in height can break the text formatting, and the 19px in length was mainly put in to keep them relatively small. IIRC. MisterPepe talk 00:34, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

I understand the 19 high, but limiting them to squares is just dumb. Lots of people liked using their picture as their entire sig. Sheesh... Entrea Sumatae [Talk] 00:35, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

The hight limit makes perfect sense, but the length limit is honestly one of the crappiest ideas I've ever heard. What's wrong with using a sig image that clearly shows the name, even if it's a bit longer than 19px??--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 00:37, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

It's against policy, that's why. :/ Lord Belar 03:13, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Fuck policy. It doesn't make a BIT of sense. They have the same visual effects, yet one's illegal. That's like having a black person and a white person both apply for the same job with the same credentials, and only the white guy gets the job. It's racism, but with sigs.--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 03:36, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

So Sigism? And Marco, I don't like it either, but the old way of thinking on GWW is "Fuck common sense, worship policy". Calor (t) 03:38, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Part of the reason I choose not to usually contribute there.--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 03:41, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

It kinda became pick your poison. Either go down with the sinking ship (at the time) of Gravewit, Wikia, and a bitching community, or come to the land of "Let's have f—" *Whack* *Boom* *Bah* *Slap* *Sig Warning* *Image Warning* *Pin to Wall* *Tie Up* *Throw In Closet*. Calor (t) 03:44, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

The "Ship" is still alive IMO.--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 03:46, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

It recovered, but at that point things looked real ugly. Calor (t) 03:50, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

eh--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 03:51, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Yeah... maybe for the sake of Guild Wars and the wiki, someone should go on a (figurative) jihad and lay waste of GWW's boat so they come back to our boat instead. No one wants to be on a boat on the bottom of the ocean! --Gimmethegepgun 04:47, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Wiki holy wars ftw. Calor (t) 05:04, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Instead of moaning about signature images, using terms the wrong way, and saying this sucks and that sucks, why don't you actually propose a new revision of the policy? All I've seen so far is Marco takling only on User talk pages about his sig, Gimme saying all of GWW's policies are rubbish, and to (whether jokingly, or not) "lay waste" to GWW.

If you tried proposing a new revision, on the talk page or as a new draft subpage, maybe it could be changed. At least you'll have tried to get it changed, instead of just complaining. -- Brains12 • Talk • 17:50, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Except everyone already knows what we want/propose: GW:SIGN --Gimmethegepgun 19:46, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

It does suck, but I'm too lazy to do anything about it (honestly) and it hardly even affects me. It just confuses me because if the whole point of GWW:SIGN is to avoid visually disruptive signatures, why should two sigs that have the same visual effects be different from each other in whether they're allowed or not? And if I really wanted to get it changed, all I'd do is copy+paste GW:SIGN into a new draft proposal into GWW:SIGN. And where was I using terms incorrectly, unless you're talking about the rascism example, that's only to get my point across.--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 20:03, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Paramore

OMG Paramore didnt make it on your top 50 i guess i Failed At Everything

lmao i luv ur page

--Shadowphoenix 04:11, 26 January 2008 (UTC)Shadow

Thanks. I don't like Paramore much, so sue me :P--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 04:12, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

np everyone has there own opinion :o)

--Shadowphoenix 04:15, 26 January 2008 (UTC)Shadow

OMG no flaming for my opinion?!?!? IT'S A SIGN OF THE APOCOLYPSE!!!!!--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 04:18, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

lmao something tells me that some ppl dont like ur opinions lol :o)

--Shadowphoenix 04:20, 26 January 2008 (UTC)Shadow

Scroll up >.> --MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 04:21, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

lol i see and 2nd of all Cursed Angel no wonder lol i kno that one from GWW. I think everyone is entiltled to an opinion as long as it is not a bad one about me lol :o) u can keep this one up as evidence that someone hasnt argued with u over ur opinion lol

--Shadowphoenix 04:25, 26 January 2008 (UTC)Shadow

Loll, I can't keep it up, or everyone will know that the Apocolypse is coming, remember?--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 04:27, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

lol i guess ur right about that 1 XD maybe ill make one of those lists :o)

--Shadowphoenix 04:30, 26 January 2008 (UTC)Shadow

Um, does your sig not like indents or what? Lord Belar 04:39, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Oh how I hope ur not talking to me }:\

--Shadowphoenix 04:46, 26 January 2008 (UTC)Shadow

Well, considering your sig is the one that doesn't like indents, and there's only two of us here, I would assume that it was directed at you. Perhaps.--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 04:48, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

No, it was directed at readem. >:| Lord Belar 04:49, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Is This better???--Shadowphoenix 04:51, 26 January 2008 (UTC)Shadow

Yup. Lord Belar 04:52, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

DAMN UR GOOD

ur really good at rhyming XD--Shadowphoenix 05:50, 26 January 2008 (UTC)SHADOW

Thank you :P--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 05:51, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

That user is gonna be mad or glad???--Shadowphoenix 05:53, 26 January 2008 (UTC)Shadow

I dunno. Amazed w/ my rad rhyming skills, it's the latest fad.--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 05:54, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

G2G had fun tho XD :o)--Shadowphoenix 05:56, 26 January 2008 (UTC)Shadow

It's been fun, bro. I woe that you have to go.--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 05:58, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Y'know its been over a year of me wikiing, and that hadn't happened yet. I feel like I have lost something. Lord of all tyria 14:55, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

IP

Please don't copy stuff right of GuildWiki, especially important stuff like policy documentation. GW2W uses the same license as GWW. Nothing from GuildWiki can be copied unless everyone involved with the original document explicitly OKs it. Backsword 09:30, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Pardon the unrelatedness of the subject, but why the "IP" heading? -- Brains12 • Talk • 10:38, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

My bad. If I ask JediRogue if it's ok that it's copied over, will it ok?--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 11:49, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

plx no fail from guildwiki or pvx, those wikis are the definition of fail --Virus Angel 13:37, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

That comment was phail+flamesauce--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 20:58, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

No. JediRogue and Entropy both have significant contributions to the article, and neither are dual-licensed GFDL. Both would need to make an announcement on GuildWiki that they've released (at least that work) under the GFDL as well. Afterwards, you'd still need to give them credit for it somehow, preferably by having a Sysop import the page (at least a link to the page history in the edit summary).

I would assume the "IP" stands for "Intellectual Property," by the way. MisterPepe talk 21:31, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Youfail song

I know it has credits if you watch long enough. I'll try and take a pic when I can.Entrea Sumatae [Talk] 00:22, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

DING! Found it! The song is Wizards in Winter by the Trans-Siberian Orchestra! If you need proof, I took a picture of the page.Entrea Sumatae [Talk] 00:28, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I've sat through the whole thing like 20 times (no exaggeration)--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 03:23, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

RT <3 that song 88.109.18.203 06:16, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

I could've told you that a long time ago... Lulz. --- -- (s)talkpage 21:46, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

But he still hasn't updated his list to account for the fact that Youfail.org isn't the artist.Entrea Sumatae [Talk] 23:44, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Can't be arsed to. If you're annoyed by it, feel free to change it--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 00:53, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Nee jij

Dutch is in, apparently. Do you speak it? -- Armond Warblade 07:08, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Voor zo ver ik weet niet. Maar ik wel. FYI, it says: As far as I know he doesn't. But I do. Dutch is my native language :P --- -- (s)talkpage 18:16, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

FINALLY. Someone translates what they say in another language. Calor 18:32, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

I don't speak Dutch, sorry.--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 18:36, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

@Calor: It's cause it was to someone I don't know of if he/she/it speaks Dutch :P --- -- (s)talkpage 18:43, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Works for me. Calor 18:49, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

wat de neuk? —̵SEERINFLOOMES 21:25, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Dat de neuk! --- -- (s)talkpage 21:27, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

[1]

If you knew Dutch, you'd know why I'm posting this. Tis about your Edit Summary, and what you removed. It made me lol. --- -- (s)talkpage 19:31, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Just looked up the dutch-english translation. I have to admit, that's ironic. Calor 21:11, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

It reminds me of "Don't be a Dick" policies. --- -- (s)talkpage 21:15, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

ROFL, that's f---ing hilarious--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 00:53, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

It's crazy how well it fits the situation. Calor 00:55, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

XD -- Armond Warblade 02:08, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

lol Cress Arvein 01:03, 4 March 2008 (UTC)