User talk:Vipermagi
Great was Anemos[edit]
True story.
Oh yeah, I made this page neater by stuffing all those seemingly random messages under one header. Anemos 04:13, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
"That's a lot of colons."[edit]
Wow.. this is retarded, somone stole my name >.< (iswarw) 195.93.21.68 20:48, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- Lols, you got owned :) --- Vipermagi -- (s)talkpage 20:49, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- not anymore I didnt! AHAH! Warwick.. 20:50, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- lol XD - Y0_ich_halt 20:51, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- We = PvWin.. Level 7 at RoF, ascended, full 15k druid, perf stormbow, black widow pet.. Warwick..
- lol XD - Y0_ich_halt 20:51, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- not anymore I didnt! AHAH! Warwick.. 20:50, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- I think all accounts got transferred over from the official wiki, cause Special:Listusers shows a LOT of users :P --- Vipermagi -- (s)talkpage 20:52, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- read em's stuff. (Talk:Main Page) ^^ - Y0_ich_halt 20:53, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- I think all accounts got transferred over from the official wiki, cause Special:Listusers shows a LOT of users :P --- Vipermagi -- (s)talkpage 20:52, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- Olol, Warwick = thief of his own identity! :P --- Vipermagi -- (s)talkpage 20:54, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- Hah, I thought the same. Randomtime 21:29, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- Olol, Warwick = thief of his own identity! :P --- Vipermagi -- (s)talkpage 20:54, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- Weird people have thesame thoughts? :D --- -- (s)talkpage 21:31, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- weird minds think alike? XD - Y0_ich_halt 21:33, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- Weird people repeat weird sentences? ^^ --- -- (s)talkpage 21:38, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- weird people talk about repeating weird sentences about weird minds thinking weird thoughts? XD - Y0_ich_halt 21:43, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- Weird stuff happens every now and then. --- -- (s)talkpage 21:44, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- /agree. weird, isn't it? - Y0_ich_halt 21:46, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- Weird stuff happens every now and then. --- -- (s)talkpage 21:44, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- Weirdest thing that happened to me on this wiki, fo'sho :D --- -- (s)talkpage 21:46, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- because nothing else has happened to you here yet? ^^ - Y0_ich_halt 21:47, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- Weirdest thing that happened to me on this wiki, fo'sho :D --- -- (s)talkpage 21:46, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- It's weird that you know nothing weird has occured to me yet. --- -- (s)talkpage 21:48, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- cuz i'm a weirdo! - Y0_ich_halt 21:48, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- It's weird that you know nothing weird has occured to me yet. --- -- (s)talkpage 21:48, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- /joins Y0. Now we're both weirdo's! Weird how such things go eh --- -- (s)talkpage 21:50, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- /weirdclap. this sounds weird. and as weird as it is, i gotta leav now. weirdly of course... - Y0_ich_halt 21:54, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- /joins Y0. Now we're both weirdo's! Weird how such things go eh --- -- (s)talkpage 21:50, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- Have a weird night sleep! Weirdo... --- -- (s)talkpage 21:55, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
(Reset indent) hi weirdo! - Y0_ich_halt 13:30, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- Ohaider weirdo no.1 :D --- -- (s)talkpage 13:49, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- ya, and you're only weirdo no. 2 :P i'm the weird weirdo leader! - Y0_ich_halt 13:56, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- Yup. It's, for a change, not weird, cause I said: "/joins Y0" :D We need more weird weirdo's :D --- -- (s)talkpage 13:57, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- Well, I'm teh wierdo leader!!!11one! Ohaider btw.. --Warwick
- Yup. It's, for a change, not weird, cause I said: "/joins Y0" :D We need more weird weirdo's :D --- -- (s)talkpage 13:57, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- No, you're not. Weirdo's thinking he's weirder than the Weirdo Leader, a.k.a. Y0! :O --- -- (s)talkpage 14:17, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- Wierdos are so wierd they have no leader. haxx. --Warwick
- No, you're not. Weirdo's thinking he's weirder than the Weirdo Leader, a.k.a. Y0! :O --- -- (s)talkpage 14:17, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- Wierd != Weird. And Y0 and I are weird. --- -- (s)talkpage 14:21, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- Well, I'm wield as well, admit it.. --Warwick
- Wierd != Weird. And Y0 and I are weird. --- -- (s)talkpage 14:21, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- Just LOG ON already :P And you ain't "wield" :P --- -- (s)talkpage 14:23, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- Dont want to, am on a diff computer then normal. --Warwick
- Just LOG ON already :P And you ain't "wield" :P --- -- (s)talkpage 14:23, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- Wieldo (typo intentional) --- -- (s)talkpage 14:26, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- weirdos only edit logged in, so log in already. :P - Y0_ich_halt 15:18, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- Wieldo (typo intentional) --- -- (s)talkpage 14:26, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- I jsut shut down GW, and I gotta reorder my desk so I can play FarCry from behind the computer :P So it's UW farm for you, Warw --- -- (s)talkpage 15:58, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- *pukes on Warw* I wana blow some shit up, outisde GW. Sorry :) --- -- (s)talkpage 15:59, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
(Reset indent) hey, viper, how about warcraft III? XD - Y0_ich_halt 16:10, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- How did you know I enjo playing WC III TFT? --- -- (s)talkpage 16:16, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- i can read minds. - Y0_ich_halt 16:18, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- Tell me these 2 things: what FarCry game do I have, and what is a game I would love to have? --- -- (s)talkpage 16:23, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- Well, I'm not even 100% certain I'd even buy GW2, tbh... Phail --- -- (s)talkpage 16:26, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- you have farcry vengeance and the game you'd love to have is starcraft 2 or farcry 2 - Y0_ich_halt 16:40, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- Well, I'm not even 100% certain I'd even buy GW2, tbh... Phail --- -- (s)talkpage 16:26, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- FarCry: Instincts/Predator, and I'm waiting for Fable 2 :P Sorry, you phailed at that. --- -- (s)talkpage 16:45, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- no, i just told you what the weird part of your mind wants. - Y0_ich_halt 16:46, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- FarCry: Instincts/Predator, and I'm waiting for Fable 2 :P Sorry, you phailed at that. --- -- (s)talkpage 16:45, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
If your not sure about GW2[edit]
Why are you here? RT | Talk - A joyous wintersday to all 16:46, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- to be weird ¬.¬ - Y0_ich_halt 16:47, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- I said I'm not sure. Wich means I might get it (rather likely). --- -- (s)talkpage 16:48, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- and it's still more than a year. take a break of gw until then and you're fresh with enthusiasm to get gw2 ^^ - Y0_ich_halt 16:49, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- I said I'm not sure. Wich means I might get it (rather likely). --- -- (s)talkpage 16:48, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- Prolly. --- -- (s)talkpage 16:49, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- hi vipermagi :D --Cursed Angel 22:28, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- Prolly. --- -- (s)talkpage 16:49, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- Ohaider CA --- -- (s)talkpage 22:32, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- Hi Vipermagi, we've never met so nows a good of time as any :D --- Raptors / RAAAAAAAAAA!
- Ohaider CA --- -- (s)talkpage 22:32, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- Forgetting ht ebad things? That's like, 70% of the people who play GW ;) --- -- (s)talkpage 10:52, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
- lol, better start the noob article, and im maybe gonna play aoc until gw2 comes out --Cursed Angel 10:54, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
- Forgetting ht ebad things? That's like, 70% of the people who play GW ;) --- -- (s)talkpage 10:52, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
- Have fun ;) I have no idea what aoc is, though. Age of C-4? Conquest? --- -- (s)talkpage 10:56, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
- no, age of conan, its a mmorpg like wow but its made to be as realistic as possible with alot of blood :D --Cursed Angel 11:01, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
- Have fun ;) I have no idea what aoc is, though. Age of C-4? Conquest? --- -- (s)talkpage 10:56, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
- Olol. I see --- -- (s)talkpage 11:08, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
Hullo[edit]
-- (Talk) (Contr.) 22:57, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
- Ohaider --- -- (s)talkpage 23:37, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
- I'm fine. Nothing special. I do have 11 supports, 0 opposes and 1 neutral for my RFA over at Unoff 'Wiki :D And that makes me happy. How are you doing? --- -- (s)talkpage 23:45, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
- Haha, I hope mine won't violate it either :P I suppose we'll jsut have to wait untill the dust settles to see if they do. --- -- (s)talkpage 23:51, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
- /agree. I know the GW policy. I've never bothered to read GWW's (and I've never bothered editing there :P ) --- -- (s)talkpage 23:56, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
- i think MP's will be ok, since it appears to be text to those who don't know, but yours, viper, will most likely be against the policy since it has a background which is baed. - Y0_ich_halt 00:20, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
- Whaaa? That sucks... Why can't I have a bg? --- -- (s)talkpage 00:22, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
- I meant that question as "Gimme one reason how a bg would make it bad" ^^' I suck at making clear what I mean when I'm dead tired --- -- (s)talkpage 00:26, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
- me too, that's why this is my last comment for today. a background behind your signature just looks shitty. i don't wanna go deeper into why exactly (ok, it's because of the corners and the fact that you have this small differently-colored box every second post). which is also why gem's icon looks ok and why ima change my icon around a bit. - Y0_ich_halt 00:31, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
- I meant that question as "Gimme one reason how a bg would make it bad" ^^' I suck at making clear what I mean when I'm dead tired --- -- (s)talkpage 00:26, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
Oheydere[edit]
Seems to be the style. -- Armond Warblade 07:34, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
- Goede morgen deze morgen (Good morning this morning). I still prefer to say Ohaider, anyhow, when greeting on teh internetz. So, I'll just not follow "the style" ^^ --- -- (s)talkpage 14:53, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
- But styles are win! -- Armond Warblade 18:31, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
- That's why I say Goede morgen deze morgen. Jiskefet = style. --- -- (s)talkpage 19:35, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
lol[edit]
WTB +2 all skills. --71.229.204.25 23:09, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- Perfectionist. --- -- (s)talkpage 15:23, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- weird imo - Y0_ich_halt 16:45, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- What's weird is some weirdo coming by to say "weird imo", imo. --- -- (s)talkpage 16:58, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- Whos weird? nuke7 18:15, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- viper is weird, 71.229 is weird, i am weird, and now you are, too. by posting here you got infected. - Y0_ich_halt 19:19, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- So what is the scientific name for weird sickness? Elocus Caular? nuke7 20:55, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- viper is weird, 71.229 is weird, i am weird, and now you are, too. by posting here you got infected. - Y0_ich_halt 19:19, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- Whos weird? nuke7 18:15, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- What's weird is some weirdo coming by to say "weird imo", imo. --- -- (s)talkpage 16:58, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- It's called "Weird". Weird is a scientific name for Weird. --- -- (s)talkpage 21:06, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- Stating the obvious much? Calor 02:18, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- better than telling lies --Cursed Angel 03:06, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- weirder than telling lies. - Y0_ich_halt 13:13, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- ok. Cress Arvein 22:50, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
- weirder than telling lies. - Y0_ich_halt 13:13, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- better than telling lies --Cursed Angel 03:06, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- Stating the obvious much? Calor 02:18, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- It's called "Weird". Weird is a scientific name for Weird. --- -- (s)talkpage 21:06, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- Ok. Weird. --- -- (s)talkpage 23:07, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
- Weird is actually we r intellectually defunct. but Idk. nuke7 10:58, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
- i doubt that. spelling isn't one of your talents, is it? :P - Y0_ich_halt 12:59, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
- Weird is actually we r intellectually defunct. but Idk. nuke7 10:58, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
- He's
wiredwerid. Don't say anything vital, cause the FBI is hearing everything through the wire. --- -- (s)talkpage 13:24, 9 March 2008 (UTC)- it's the CIA, not the FBI, i tell ya. - Y0_ich_halt 13:42, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
- He's
stuff that I want to spam a page with[edit]
(read first, then respond, if you cba) I don't get it. Why spam up the Admin noticeboard with what "Category:Candidates for Banning" is for? If Admins just regularly check that cat (set it in their sidebar, for easier navigation), the Admin noticeboard would be less clogged with redundant sh**. Show-previewed my edit: I see there is no Cand for banning. Kay... Ban template+cat > noticeboard clogging to me. Oh well. Whatever suits you best, I suppose. </rant> --- -- (s)talkpage 10:13, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- It's generally considered rude and arrogant to slap a ban template on a user's userpage, not only because the template (on GuildWiki, at least) is hideous, but it's someone else's userpage. Not to mention anyone can remove it and then not appear on the category. Then you'll get the fake templates coming up, like Warwick's on GWiki, which is just the annoyance without the "benefits" (the category). What are you going to do then, have a revert war? Or post it on the noticeboard?
- Take out that ugly middle man and put it on the noticeboard in the first place. It also gives people the chance to discuss if that person should or shouldn't be banned, giving the admins more feedback from users. The category, in my opinion, is too much of an annoyance and a hassle. -- pling | ggggg 15:45, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- Ah, and for some history, there was a ban template during the first moments of GWW, but was removed for those very reasons. It was Template:Ban, but then moved to Admin review. gw1:Template talk:Admin review. -- pling | ggggg 15:49, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- Imo vandalising a public wiki is rude enough. Warw's has been shot down already. If someone keeps removing them, you go to the noticeboard, yes. But that rarely happens (in fact, they usually C/P it all over their page). --- -- (s)talkpage 16:17, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- I haven't seen many vandals round on GW lately, but my experience involved quite a few RV wars to keep them in said category. Lord of all tyria 16:31, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- What if the case isn't as obvious as a simple vandal=block? Do you suggest using the template for every case? And then what about the cleanup later on, when you have to delete a page which you created just to slap the template on or when you have to remove the tag off someone's userpage? Do you think that's less work than just saying "Blocked" on the noticeboard? -- pling | ggggg 16:47, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- Imo vandalising a public wiki is rude enough. Warw's has been shot down already. If someone keeps removing them, you go to the noticeboard, yes. But that rarely happens (in fact, they usually C/P it all over their page). --- -- (s)talkpage 16:17, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- It's not like I'm going to convince anyone here, so I'll just shut it. --- -- (s)talkpage 17:36, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- The image policy and the admin noticeboard are the 2 best things to come out of GWW. They work. Lord of all tyria 18:32, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- The image policy?? Please, that's got to be down there with their signature policy (aka SUCKS)--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 21:47, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- The way it is enforced is bad. The policy itself is not. And its a damn sight better than GW's mass of uncategorised ones. Lord of all tyria 21:53, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- WHICH we are working on fixing. I honestly think that having User Marcopolo47 in front of all my images is just too COMPLETELY FUCKING USELESS for the hassle.--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 21:56, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- yeah, writing all those letters is FUCKING USELESS and taeks so long time --Cursed Angel 21:59, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- Actually yes. Especially when you have to type it in every time to see that image/link to it. I've never, for the two years I've been on GuildWiki, seen a problem with people naming an image the same thing, and EVEN IF THEY DID, it's so easy to fix (name it something else for god's sake) that the extra typing is more of a hassle than what purpose it does serve. I'm glad you agree, CA--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 22:04, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- yeah, writing all those letters is FUCKING USELESS and taeks so long time --Cursed Angel 21:59, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- WHICH we are working on fixing. I honestly think that having User Marcopolo47 in front of all my images is just too COMPLETELY FUCKING USELESS for the hassle.--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 21:56, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- The way it is enforced is bad. The policy itself is not. And its a damn sight better than GW's mass of uncategorised ones. Lord of all tyria 21:53, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- The image policy?? Please, that's got to be down there with their signature policy (aka SUCKS)--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 21:47, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- The image policy and the admin noticeboard are the 2 best things to come out of GWW. They work. Lord of all tyria 18:32, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- It's not like I'm going to convince anyone here, so I'll just shut it. --- -- (s)talkpage 17:36, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
(Reset indent) (Edit conflict) The image policy is actually much more easier to put into practise (because writing a few extra words is so much hard work and I just can't do it!!) with the improved upload form - simply enter the title, choose "user space image" and the form does it for you. -- pling | ggggg 22:07, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not saying that adding the extra letters ONCE is so bad, but every time you want to link to it/find it in search box?? It does become a hassle--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 22:08, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- I find it hard to believe that something as small as User Plingggggg is so hard to type. Even with that many gs, I have no problem whatsoever and I'm not just saying that because I use the GWW. -- pling | ggggg 22:10, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- Maybe not for you, but for a slow typer like me it is a hassle. Whether you find it hard to believe or not. I don't see any purpose that it serves, either.--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 22:18, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- Organises the guild and user images, makes them easier to find through the Special:Prefixindex, makes sure they can be easily categorised and maintained, makes sure you know to whom the image belongs to (as some images are often reuploaded by other users). That's what comes off the top of my head, but I'm sure you can find more reasons in gw1:Guild Wars Wiki talk:Image use archives. -- pling | ggggg 22:28, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- Ah those are some good points that I hadn't thought of--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 22:31, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- The way it is enforced is bad, all those warnings for uploading wrong and all time for deleting images named wrong, its impossible to make new people read all that shit wall of text policys and it is useless. nearly every new user gets warned for it and theres better ways to waste time than to bother new people with deleting their images and direct them to a long essay about why their images were deleted. but writing ur name doesnt take long time --Cursed Angel 22:37, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- That's decreased heavily due to the new form - taking a look at the size of gw1:GWW:DEL just shows how much the incorrect names have been reduced. -- pling | ggggg 22:41, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- Marco, I have to disagree with you. GWW's image policy was good, because it really helped everyone avoid a huge mess .jpg images. But that is the only thing that is good about GWW :D nuke7 09:57, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
- That's decreased heavily due to the new form - taking a look at the size of gw1:GWW:DEL just shows how much the incorrect names have been reduced. -- pling | ggggg 22:41, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- The way it is enforced is bad, all those warnings for uploading wrong and all time for deleting images named wrong, its impossible to make new people read all that shit wall of text policys and it is useless. nearly every new user gets warned for it and theres better ways to waste time than to bother new people with deleting their images and direct them to a long essay about why their images were deleted. but writing ur name doesnt take long time --Cursed Angel 22:37, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- Ah those are some good points that I hadn't thought of--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 22:31, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- Organises the guild and user images, makes them easier to find through the Special:Prefixindex, makes sure they can be easily categorised and maintained, makes sure you know to whom the image belongs to (as some images are often reuploaded by other users). That's what comes off the top of my head, but I'm sure you can find more reasons in gw1:Guild Wars Wiki talk:Image use archives. -- pling | ggggg 22:28, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- Maybe not for you, but for a slow typer like me it is a hassle. Whether you find it hard to believe or not. I don't see any purpose that it serves, either.--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 22:18, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- I find it hard to believe that something as small as User Plingggggg is so hard to type. Even with that many gs, I have no problem whatsoever and I'm not just saying that because I use the GWW. -- pling | ggggg 22:10, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
:|[edit]
Argh. -- Luigi (T/C) 15:02, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
- RRrrrawr --- -- talkpage 16:33, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
gold/silver/copper[edit]
WHYY?!? --Naoroji 11:05, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
- Good question. Whyyyyy. I always find the 100->1 conversion confusing for some reason.
- Semi-related: Imagine living in Tyria, wandering around with a couple hundred gold and two platinum. Suddenly, the gov' decides it's not good enough, and enforces a three-tier system with a different multiplier. Enjoy! What happened to all the platinum anyways? --- Vipermagi 17:47, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
Redirect[edit]
Is this File:VipermagiSig.jpg Needed? It's in double redirect section linking to your talk and your current sig... Ariyen 20:06, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- Technically, no. It's how I uploaded my sig initially (shorter + conveys the same message was my reasoning). Shewmake eventually moved it because I guess it wasn't good enough. Now there's a *lot* of double-redirects. Looks like a couple people figured they'd fix it and then decided not to, after all. Funny how that works, eh. Easy way out? Re-upload it. --- Vipermagi 17:47, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
Spam[edit]
Hello there Viper, is it ok if I just leave a bit of spam here? --El_Nazgir 21:37, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
- Fine by me. Nice dog, btw :p --- Vipermagi 17:47, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
- Shut up you Mursaat hater. --El_Nazgir 19:41, 18 December 2011 (UTC)