User talk:Inquest Overseer Ezrielia/Archive 1

From Guild Wars 2 Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search


A belated welcome to our wiki community, and thanks for the many edits you've made to improve our articles! It's always nice to see Inquest geniuses making nice and informative contributions to the world. :) --Kossage (talk) 19:11, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Oh! Thank you so much :D That is very welcoming ^^ I try to do my best, but I don't know the whole pages required structuring and many others things :) I never been a real fan of collaborative platforms. --Inquest Overseer Ezrielia (talk) 18:26, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Inquest Asuran Gate

Hi there. You recently moved Gate (The Funhouse) to [[Inquest Asuran Gate]]. Was the Funhouse name changed to Inquest Asuran Gate? —Ventriloquist 13:10, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Hey there! The funhouse is still the funhouse, BUT The gate used as the entrance, is an object very common around tyria, an Asuran stone gate. I would agree if you want to rename it funhouse gate, but then we need another page for this object: (see the locations I added on the object page.), I added between parenthesis the location, I tried as an (caption =) but don't seem working. --Inquest Overseer Ezrielia (talk) 14:20, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello again! I left a comment on [[Talk:Inquest Stone Gate]] for further discussions on the topic. —Ventriloquist 21:39, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Talk pages

I apologize for being 2 days late on this but I wanted to give you a heads up: users aren't to blank or remove conversations from their talk page unless they're moving a conversation from one page to another or removing spam. I've restored the above conversation you had with Vent, but if you wish to remove it from your page, you can move your current talk page to a new page (like "User talk:Inquest Overseer Ezrielia/Archive 1" or something) and start nice and fresh again if you so desire. Cheers! - Doodleplex 22:43, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Image uploads for [[User:Inquest Overseer Ezrielia/Asuran Expansion Project]]

I was cleaning up Category:ArenaNet concept art earlier and saw at the end a bunch of images uploaded by yourself in there, which seem to just be official concept art that's been resized. Since resizing is something that can be done manually via adding |###px to the image linking (which you seem to use anyways), I was wondering if it'd be alright to just swap out with the actual concept art images. The originals are unlikely to be moved, and if they were, they'd get relinked on userspace pages as well anyways, so if you re-uploaded for that kind of reasoning you have no reason to worry. Thanks. Konig (talk) 02:01, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

User images

Putting you images here so they are used somewhere. [[File:User Inquest Overseer Ezrielia Asuran alphabet 0.png|30px]][[File:User Inquest Overseer Ezrielia Asuran alphabet 1.png|30px]][[File:User Inquest Overseer Ezrielia Asuran alphabet 2.png|30px]][[File:User Inquest Overseer Ezrielia Asuran alphabet 3.png|30px]][[File:User Inquest Overseer Ezrielia Asuran alphabet 4.png|30px]][[File:User Inquest Overseer Ezrielia Asuran alphabet 5.png|30px]][[File:User Inquest Overseer Ezrielia Asuran alphabet 6.png|30px]][[File:User Inquest Overseer Ezrielia Asuran alphabet 7.png|30px]][[File:User Inquest Overseer Ezrielia Asuran alphabet 8.png|30px]][[File:User Inquest Overseer Ezrielia Asuran alphabet 9.png|30px]] [[File:User Inquest Overseer Ezrielia Dragon domains.jpg|30px]] —Kvothe (talk) 15:49, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

ty. -- 14:54, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Your additions to Timeline

I'm afraid i have to agree with the IP's removal of the creation of Rata Primus. I'd go even further and remove the facility in Fahranur too. For the Fahranur facility there's an earlier reference on an inquest terminal stating, quoting the dialogue on the aricle, "Your package was unable to be delivered. Last attempted delivery was—seventeen years, eight months, and nine days—ago." indicating there had been an outage or some kind of disruption of the core. There is also nothing preventing the facility to have existed before these dates. They only give the earliest date we can tell that the facility existed but that doesn't mean that it was built exactly then too. And while i didn't easily see any earlier reference for Rata Primus than the 87 days, the same holds true for it. Only because we can tell the earliest it existed seems to have been then, that doesn't prevent it from having existed already before that. Based on this, i'll remove both entries; provided you don't have any good arguments against me doing so. Nightsky (talk) 20:57, 27 June 2021 (UTC)