Talk:Shining Blade

From Guild Wars 2 Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Just delete it. No mention in any of the ArenaNet content pages. Cress Arvein User Cress Arvein sig.JPG 22:39, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Do we know if they will make a comeback in Gw2 ??-- 04:47, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

They are said to be the right hand of the queen. But this is via second hand source. My personal belief is that the Shining Blade and Lionguard merged after the defeat of the White Mantle, since their purpose (excluding the mantle thing) is the same after Prophecies - protect the Krytans and the royal family. I think the Seraph Guard is the combination of the two. -- Konig/talk 05:35, 24 March 2010 (UTC)


IMO, the article is still too much about GW1 information. The GWW box (which imo shouldn't be at the top of the page, rather at the History section) already allows users to know in details the Shining Blade history. Stating that they were the primary antagonist of the White Mantle is redundant, since we had already stated that they were created to fight the White Mantle; and stating that some Shining Blade operatives helped to defeat the Great Destroyer (wasn't it only Livia? I had the feeling that Hayda had been kicked from the group) is the kind of small detail that isn't important enough to be here. Erasculio 14:44, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

I changed the GWW box but I still think it's fine the way it is now until we recieve more information. --User The Holy Dragons sig.pngThe Holy Dragons 14:52, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Regarding the box: Thus far, the gww template has always gone at the top unless there are images - in which case it goes to the lowest section. This is the same on gw1. Not a rule, but rather just how it's been done. Regarding the "too much gw1 information" - I disagree. the History section will likely never increase from what we got now, and that's a perfect amount - a mere small summary of things that happened in the past. It may expand on post-gw1 events, but not by gw1 events. It's far better than charr and how mursaat was. It just looks like a lot of gw1 information due to the lack of gw2 information - that is, we have more gw1 information up than we do gw2 information because we don't have any more gw2 information. This will change in the future, but the amount of gw1 information up there should remain the same imo. -- Konig/talk 21:30, 5 January 2011 (UTC)