Talk:M.I.G.

From Guild Wars 2 Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

Two pages?[edit]

Is this suppose to be the same as MIG? Same story involvement, but description is different... -Darqam (talk) 19:31, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Two different descriptions because it was written by two different people, as I'm quite sure they are the same golem. The trick is the dialogue might refer to it without the periods which is why I'd guess there are two pages, and it probably should just redirect here, but it should be verified first to see if that's the case(periods in name but not in dialogue) or not. - Doodleplex 19:46, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
I'm pretty sure they're both the same NPCs. Louise recently redirected the page he created (without periods) to Alex's version, so I'm assuming this is the same thing. —Ventriloquist 19:51, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
The golems always have the periods but folks tend to forget them. Same with good ol' gw1:M.O.X. in GW1, folks often called him just Mox and searched that instead. Golem names can be hard, yo! Konig 20:08, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
I redirected it here, but I'd still like to know if the in game dialogue has the periods or not, as currently we have it without the periods. - Doodleplex 20:12, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
All story instances have M.I.G. in the dialogue on this wiki. I'd go with that. Konig 21:13, 13 July 2016 (UTC) EDIT: Clarifying: The dialogue itself seem to use MIG over M.I.G., but the NPC names in the dialogue sections are always M.I.G. instead of MIG. Konig 21:16, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
The NPC is definitely called M.I.G. with the dots. Could someone please phrase the opening lines to refer to Doxa + the College of Dynamics storyline? Without spoilers to O.M.I.G. preferably.
Also sorry 2013 users for not finding MIG - I generally assume pages will match the ingame name... -Chieftain AlexUser Chieftain Alex sig.png 21:48, 13 July 2016 (UTC)