Guild Wars 2 Wiki talk:Projects/Media watch

I'm trying to get my hands on scans of the Ecology of the Charr article. I've posted a thread on GWO here, but if I don't get anything soon then I'll go through the Ultimate Guide threads on GWO and Guru and PM anyone who said they had scans to see if they still have them. As soon as it becomes available, I'll transcribe it and put it up here. --Santax (talk · contribs) 09:44, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Dream of Dreams

I kinda already updated that, but if you think it should be changed, you're welcome to leave it on the to-do list. :) --Amannelle 04:32, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Hey cool. I didn't notice. :) I'll remove the link from the project. I'll give your work a proof read later because that article is getting pretty long now. Maybe once I've updated the norn culture section... Thanks Amannelle! -- aspectacle  04:49, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Guardian backstory

As it's the first backstory for any profession on GW2W, shall we just put it above the Notes with its own header? - Infinite - talk 11:54, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Works for me. We can always change it later if something better comes up. -- aspectacle  20:03, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

I'll incorporate the information then, give me a minute~ - Infinite - talk 20:05, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

full pledged demo footage?

54 gameplay vid from Spotlight worth saying? After all, it is a full demo with sound straight from computer. - Lucian 21:53, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

It's German, but numbers/etc are international. :) - Infinite - talk 22:44, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Reviewing

Curious as to whether it'd be redundant or worthwhile to do like a small notation in the contributor column as to who has looked at a listed article. As in, if I looked through the Tap article I'd then update the watchpage table by adding in 'R' to the Contributor column and if, say, Infinite also looked at it then he'd toss in an 'I' as well. I ask this because information of course gets overlooked, multiple people wind up looking at articles anyways, and sometimes it's hard to individually really tell what sort of information is Wiki-worthy. After maybe like 2-3 entries in the contributor column, then we could reliably move an article/footage into the completed list and move on? Just a thought. As an addendum, my edit cleaned up the links and added myself to the project. Redshift 14:25, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

We could just make contributor "contributors" and when a multitude of users updated the destined articles we can consider it completed for this project. I wouldn't mind doing it as you proposed at all. :) - Infinite - talk 14:32, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

I'd be pleased to give it a run if you'd like. Redshift 14:49, 5 July 2011 (UTC)