User talk:Gem

Please leave new messages at the bottom of the page.

Hi

Hello! --brains12 • (talk) • 21:18, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

woo, everyone coming over here now. hi ^^ - Y0_ich_halt 21:18, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Heya Gem. Good luck with the policy thing. >_< --Aspectacle 21:20, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi all. :) I hope this wiki will do well since it's currently the only GW2 wiki. I hope no one bothers to create another one to mess up the situation. And I hope the policies aren't screwed up this time. -- (gem / talk) 21:21, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

yup. i think first thing we should discuss are policies here ^^ - Y0_ich_halt 21:22, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

I'm all for content - as long as I can add content I'll be... er... content. ;) --Aspectacle 21:28, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

I'm thinking we need to nominate good new admins (I meant it when i said good), I nominate Gem!. Also, I think we need to discuss policies and have them set down IMMEDIATELY. --Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 21:34, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Such as admin policys lol. I May reconsider shifting focus if this works out Randomtime 21:37, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

first thing are the policies. once we have those we can discuss whether to elect new admins or keep gww ones. - Y0_ich_halt 21:38, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Gwwiki admins are indecisive. I'm voting for new ones, we need people who will do things instead of waiting for hours to ask permission from people to ban them, or having a vote for three weeks before taking any action at all.. --Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 21:39, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

that's only because of the policies, which is why we need to create those first. - Y0_ich_halt 21:41, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Yes, there's definitely nothing wrong with the persons acting as gww admins, only in the policies that control them. And no, I'm not running for adminship, atleast not yet even if asked to. I'll see where this thing goes first and then decide on whether I'll stay or not. :) -- (gem / talk) 08:40, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Howdy Gem :) --- Raptors / RAAAAAAAAAA!

Hiya gem :D --Cursed Angel 20:48, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Bleh

Funny that I'm forced to upload my sig image here now since both wikis use the same account and same sig. :P -- (gem / talk) 08:41, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Or you change your sig ;) --- -- (s)talkpage 08:48, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Well it's still the same on both wikis... -- (gem / talk) 08:54, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

But it still doesn't force you to upload it, and that was my point. --- -- (s)talkpage 08:56, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

And my "rant" was a random toungue in cheeck comment. ^^ -- (gem / talk) 18:50, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Fun... 88.110.226.89 18:53, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

I'm guessing they just shoved over the account DB table, but obviously didn't want to duplicate all the images. :) Biscuits 19:25, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

I had to re-upload my signature image too, but my signature was already set up. They just scooted everyone's preferences over, basically. (Probably what Biscuits said.) Not a big deal, although it did scare me for a moment when I tried to create my account and it said "name already in use"... -- Jïörüjï Ðērākō.>.cнаt^ 20:03, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

On the subject of scooting things over, did all the adminships and whatnot get copied as well? Or are we starting over with administrators? -- Jïörüjï Ðērākō.>.cнаt^ 20:06, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

They got copied over, but most people would like to re-elect sysops. --- -- (s)talkpage 20:07, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

(Edit conflict) All current sysops and bcrats have been carried over. It is still being discussed how to put in place an admin system, and whether or not we will change admins at Guild Wars 2 Wiki talk:Policy. -- br12 • (talk) • 20:08, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Warwick

TY for banning us, that was really getting annoying.--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 16:37, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Actually, marco i was joking.. --Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 16:39, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

It didn't seem like it...--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 16:40, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, thats 'cause im good at acting. --Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 16:41, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

...gg warw --MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 16:42, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

i clicked on my talk to edit and say, btw marco you know i was only joking? and it said that gem had banned me. -.- --Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 16:42, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

LOL that sucks.--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 16:43, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Sadly, i cant be prevented from contributing anyway. My IP has an automatic changer, and it actually changes once about ever 15 mins.. --Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 16:44, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Actually your IPs seem to be from a very narrow range so I could easily block the whole range. -- (gem / talk) 16:45, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

lol, and I could just unban myself, but that's cheating :P --MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 16:46, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Nope, not narrow. Yesterday, par example, it was 11. somthing. And if marco unbanned himself, I'd shut the wiki down untill his ban had run out. (I could do that- I've done it before to a wiki) --Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 16:47, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

What do you mean, "Shut it down?" --MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 16:47, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

You guys aren't helping the situation at all. Do you really think that you act maturely and are helpful to the wiki? Please, try to grow up, especially Warwick. -- (gem / talk) 16:48, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Prevent anyone acessing the site, basically create a lockdown. --Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 16:49, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Ok, anyways, you wanna unban us gem? It was simple jokeage.--MP47 (Talk) (Contr.) 16:50, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

I will unban you Marco since you asked nicely, but Warwick just discusses how he is getting around my ban and how he could lock down the wiki, instead of doing what I asked you guys to do. -- (gem / talk) 16:51, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

(Edit conflict)

Notes

Warwick was only joking about being able to shut down the site

Warwick was joking about being insulted

Marco wanted to be unbanned

Warwick wants to be unbanned

yay? --Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 16:52, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

gem grow up plx? why do they have to say sorry to u? --Cursed Angel 16:55, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

^I like the above guy^ --Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 16:55, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

CA: You don't need to comment if you haven't followed the situation on GWiki for the past few weeks. And I'm not the only user who thinks that this is currently a bit too much, so a small ban with an unban after a simple apology isn't childish or even unjust. -- (gem / talk) 16:58, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Nice to hear you think so. Shame its not gonna happen. --Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 16:59, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

What isn't gonna happen? Anyway, you've now also been unblocked and I beg you to behave properly in the future, for the sake of us all. -- (gem / talk) 17:01, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

I was joking. and what i was saying its not gonna happen to is apologising- I never apologise. I say thanks though, so thanks ^^ --Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:02, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

So, Warw, how much for that botnet? RT | Talk - A joyous wintersday to all 20:34, 24 December 2007 (UTC)