Template talk:Reward track infobox

Discussion

I'm fairly new to editing wiki pages, especially templates. Therefore I'm not quite sure if I should already add this template to the reward track pages. The idea behind this template is, that nearly every page has an infobox, except the reward track pages. The infobox will give us a link to the final reward, shows if the track is repeatable and where it can be obtained. Additionally the reward track pages look so "empty" on the left side. So before I want to apply it to the reward track, I wanted the following questions to be anwsered.

• Can someone approve/correct my code before adding the infobox to the reward tracks?
• Should the repeatable option either be displayed as Yes/No or as 1/0?
• Which other options can be added?

Tolkyria (talk) 19:25, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Looks fine to me, text over checkmarks to match infoboxes and we aren't fighting for text space in the infobox. Checkmarks are better for tables.--Relyk ~ talk < 01:44, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Requires and Release

Could we switch the "| requires =" paramenter to "| requirement =" or "| needs =" or something along those lines so that the "release" parameter can be changed to "requires" since "Template:Infobox release" got moved to "Template:Infobox requires" after this template was made, and I'd like to fix the redirects. - Do_odleplex 19:55, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Lol, so you're saying you're not telling your bot which templates its allowed to fix or not, and you'd rather have this template parameter renamed to allow blind replacement? :D Why not just use the "template" option in AWB? -Chieftain Alex 20:16, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

I'm a little confused. I just want to rename a parameter to fix a redirect, "Template:Infobox release". I wasn't even thinking of my bot. - Do_odleplex 20:21, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

FWIW, the Spanish wiki has the same template and switched the parameter so it didn't have the same issue. Hence why I'd like to do the same fix here? - Do_odleplex 21:11, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

One could argue that the parameter names as they are used right now exactly describes what they are doing, but in terms of consistency, go ahead, rename them. --Tolkyria (talk) 21:17, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Would "Requirement" work okay for you then? I think it's close enough to the original parameter to work, no? - Do_odleplex 21:28, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Sure. --Tolkyria (talk) 21:35, 28 November 2020 (UTC)