Guild Wars 2 Wiki:Admin noticeboard/Archive 1

From Guild Wars 2 Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

80.176.240.211 (talkcontribslogsblock log)

Impersonating User:Warwick. Don't know how you'll deal with this, but you have effectively ultimate discretion. Enjoy! --Talk br12(talk) 20:23, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Wow, first person on the noticeboard, that's like GuildWars history right therre, lol. Anyways, did he do anything wrong like vandalize one of our 12 pages? :P — Eloc 22:37, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Nope, he sort of insulted some users and impersonated Warwick. Which reminds me...--Talk br12(talk) 23:08, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Cursed AngeI (talkcontribslogsblock log)

Impersonating User:Cursed Angel. Take note that the character at the end is not an L, but a capitalised i. --Talk br12(talk) 23:08, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Most likely the same person as the anon above. --- Raptors / RAAAAAAAAAA!

98.199.128.134 (talkcontribslogsblock log)

Any admins around? GW2W's first day of vandalism. Vandalizing anon, probably about ten years old. Calor (t) 01:40, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

warned. poke | talk 01:05, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

See below

Hoondred Bladez (talkcontribslogsblock log)

Evisroote (talkcontribslogsblock log) - sock of User:Mgrinshpon (see talk page)

Duvooste Hammar (talkcontribslogsblock log) - sock of User:Skakid9090 (see talk page of Erf Shakuur (talkcontribslogsblock log) )

Seerin Floomes (talkcontribslogsblock log) - impersonating me, it seems...

All above made for trolling/socks and whatnot. You may also want to delete all those images they've unnecessarily uploaded. -- Brains12Talk 20:24, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

I am User:Feardrake --Hoondred Bladez 20:25, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
Brains, Please see the message on Feardrake's page. I want you to deleet Feardrake and leave hoondred, please. --—HOONDREDUser Hoondred Bladez.jpgBLADEZ 20:33, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
THEY'RE PRETTY COOL YO. —̵EVISUser Evisroote Evisroote.jpgROOTE 20:37, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
Screw this. brains, just delete hoondred (me) if you want to. Since im a sock of feardrake. --—HOONDREDUser Hoondred Bladez.jpgBLADEZ 20:53, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
Brains isnt an admin. Calor (t) 21:12, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
Lol, they've not done any damage. All they've done is fool around. No harm done, seriously, so why bother? If they try to influence votes, yeah, ban 'em, but... Armond 21:46, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

77.102.184.83 (talkcontribslogsblock log)

Spam / trolling / vandalism. -- Gordon Ecker 10:27, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

User rights log says you're a sysop? Or have I just failed at reading? Lord of all tyria 10:28, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, I didn't notice that, 77.102.184.83 is blocked and the spam page has been deleted. -- Gordon Ecker 10:40, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
:P Lord Belar 18:38, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

124.217.251.166 (talkcontribslogsblock log)

Spam pages. Lord of all tyria 15:38, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Blocked. - anja talk 16:31, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

68.56.124.46 (talkcontribslogsblock log)

Returning vandal. — Eloc 04:28, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked. -- Gordon Ecker 06:50, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

69.49.46.74 (talkcontribslogsblock log)

Vandal. --77.98.23.140 16:29, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Heh, he left because nobody notice him. Calor Talk 17:49, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Not more than 20min ago I RV'd that anon. --- User Vipermagi Sig.jpg-- (s)talkpage 17:51, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
He started early, came back, blocked. — Gares 18:00, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

68.178.85.106 (talkcontribslogsblock log)

Eloc 05:25, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Blocked. -- Gordon Ecker 05:59, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

89.55.64.210 (talkcontribslogsblock log)

Vandal. --People of Antioch talk User People of Antioch sig.png 03:24, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Blocked. -- Gordon Ecker 06:20, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

67.159.44.138 (talkcontribslogsblock log)

NPA ~ SCobraUser-SuperCobra-Sig.png 09:23, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Posted on the talk page. --Xeeron 11:27, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
How about a definitive ban?. ~ SCobraUser-SuperCobra-Sig.png 19:27, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
I don't see a need for that. If there are more bad edits, maybe, but not now. - anja talk 23:40, 5 April 2008 (UTC)