File talk:2009 December asura 03.jpg
From Guild Wars 2 Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
They look ugly -.- 85.29.100.120 13:55, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
- I like them ^_^ I want to be one. --Amannelle 14:36, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
- IP is right though. Asura in their GW2 state are quite ugly,... :/ At least, imo. --Naoroji 14:43, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
- Well, considering they're Asura, I personally like their look. I mean, they are SUPPOSED to be a bit ugly; or at least uglier than people. But, I suppose "ugliness" has been scientifically proven to be based on fickle subconscious analysis, so really whether they're "pretty" or "ugly" is a very minor factor to me, since every human has a different opinion. ^^; --Amannelle 14:49, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
- Well,... For non-human/monster-ish races, there's 'awesome ugly', and 'stupid ugly'. GW1 Asura belonged in the former category, GW2 Asura belong in the latter category, imo XD. --Naoroji 14:50, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
- It's their heads, their heads are too big and their ears are too small. Though her head buns alleviate it somewhat. --hexal 14:53, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
- ^^ Well, tbh that's mostly due to a form of neophobia, but I suppose I can relate. ^^ --Amannelle 14:54, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
- Although I prefer the new design of Asura, my preference lies in the design as seen in the trailers. For some reason they look better in the trailer; I wonder if that means they've been updated? ^^; --Amannelle 14:54, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
- It's their heads, their heads are too big and their ears are too small. Though her head buns alleviate it somewhat. --hexal 14:53, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
- Well,... For non-human/monster-ish races, there's 'awesome ugly', and 'stupid ugly'. GW1 Asura belonged in the former category, GW2 Asura belong in the latter category, imo XD. --Naoroji 14:50, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
- Well, considering they're Asura, I personally like their look. I mean, they are SUPPOSED to be a bit ugly; or at least uglier than people. But, I suppose "ugliness" has been scientifically proven to be based on fickle subconscious analysis, so really whether they're "pretty" or "ugly" is a very minor factor to me, since every human has a different opinion. ^^; --Amannelle 14:49, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
- IP is right though. Asura in their GW2 state are quite ugly,... :/ At least, imo. --Naoroji 14:43, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Blegh[edit]
They look ridiculously stupid, imo..i do not want these things running around on my screen. to be perfectly blunt :) i dislike the new asura design. /rant ПALANA 22:38, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
Ugly?[edit]
Do everyone really think they are limited to those designs we've seen so far? That would just be weird... --AdventurerPotatoe - 16:12, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
- no but you have to admit the Head/Ear ratio has definetly quadripled at least for as far we've seen, but I don't think that head size will be a customizable option. The ears probably but stil with a head as big like that they probably have bigger brains or somthin so we'd better get a magic boost or something! PS: just saw another big difference, The eye colour is now more colourful instead of big black eyes. Really liked the old ones more Prince Grazel 17:59, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
- I think the bigger heads makes custom faces easier, it also adds some kind of extra feel that the original never had. --AdventurerPotatoe - 20:45, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
- These Asura (1MB, 1920x1080) look a lot nicer IMO --Karasu (talk) 14:25, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Custom faces would still be easy with the old faces. Since I've known that asura will be a playable race I knew that it would be my first character but now.. seeing them how they are.. alot uglier.. and I'm having my doubts, hope they will have some decent face for the guys --Prince Grazel 15:18, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- These Asura (1MB, 1920x1080) look a lot nicer IMO --Karasu (talk) 14:25, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- I think the bigger heads makes custom faces easier, it also adds some kind of extra feel that the original never had. --AdventurerPotatoe - 20:45, 14 August 2010 (UTC)