User talk:Gerroh

From Guild Wars 2 Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

lifting a little rock.... who are you?...don't gave me those eyes, I havent killed your cat... fine maybe I did,but that was yesterday, Welcome to this crazy society of GW2Wiki where everyone is actually looking at what you do at every sec. every day ...ALL THE TIME, enjoy :D Tech Wolf-Talk 23:43, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

No Mittens No! --NeilUser Neil2250 sig icon5 Anti.png 05:05, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

GO AWAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY--Gerroh 12:26, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

sylvari remake[edit]

It's not a rumor that the sylvari are being remade, it comes from the horse's mouth, so to speak. However, it was never said that they were being redesigned to be more mature. That would go in the opposite direction of what ArenaNet wants for the sylvari as a race. --Naoroji User Naoroji Golem - Green.jpg 10:21, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

^ Sylvari are at most 25 years old? And plants don't grow as fast as humans do, hence. - Infinite - talk 18:27, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
Note "Rumors", meaning it's not meant to be taken as fact. How could Sylvari be redesigned without looking more mature? They are restricted to being plant-type people, from the Southern Maguuma, meaning they need to resemble the flora there somewhat. It's a pretty big restriction there. They can still look young, naive and stupid and all the other gimmicks Anet wants, but they can easily do it looking like they're in their late teens/early twenties, instead of 10-12. The males aren't as bad as the females, the females are just ludicrously young looking. Anyway, it's a "rumor" for now, and marked as such, so I doubt anyone with half a brain would take it as fact.--Gerroh 02:49, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
It is not a rumor, its taken directly from ANet...sylvari are going to be remade. Anything about how they are going to be remade is speculation, but we know, for certain, that they will be remade... Aquadrizzt (talk)(contribs) 04:03, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
Yah, I misread the earlier comment slightly, but still, you could call it a rumor, or at least speculation, that the Sylvari are going to be made to look more mature. In short: I don't care, I'm not gonna bother to fix it.--Gerroh 05:20, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

You walk a fine line...[edit]

Of what is an acceptable way to discuss on a wiki. Calm down. And try to avoid calling people retards or insulting them for not thinking that the reference is clear. Aqua (T|C) 21:57, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

-Deep breath- Slash CAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARE.--Gerroh 01:11, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

PS2[edit]

You shouldn't make fun of PS2. Nor GW1. GW1 had awesome graphics. It still has. Unless you play on low resolution and graphical quality. Which indeed makes GW1 look like Final Fantasy X.
Now that I think of it, I'm not sure which has worse voice acting... Mediggo 07:12, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

GW does, by much too far. - Infinite - talk 11:14, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
Are you sure? Mediggo 11:44, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
Yeah, even with that. But tbh, that was exaggerated on purpose, as Tidus was trying to make a point. :P - Infinite - talk 12:04, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
He probably shouldn't try making a point... ever again. :P But yes, you're right. I still dislike Tidus' voice acting, however. I honestly think FFX would have been better if told from his father's point of view and his journey through Spira. Mediggo 12:23, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
That would've officially made FFX better than FFVII's legacy. Jecht's voice is probably one of my favourites. :P Look at us going off-topic though. xD - Infinite - talk 15:13, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
WTF is Final Fantasy? O_o--Icyyy Blue User IcyyyBlue Elementalist Blue.png 15:40, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
=O and you dare call yourself a gamer girl! Final Fantasy is like a god walking amongst mere video games. User Kiomadoushi sig.png Kiomadoushi 18:09, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
I like the way you think. Mediggo 05:57, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

I wasn't makin fun of Ps2, I loved PS2, it's the system I've had more games for than any other, HOWEVER it's outdated. GW1's graphics are alright, but again, outdated, and I don't think they were on par for '05, '06, and '07. I agree that Jecht was a badass, but there's too much around Tidus to tell it from Jecht's point of view, like the end, in order for Jecht to win, the world has to lose. And then there's that theory that all of FFX was just Tidus dreaming just as he was about to die. Tried to google for the page I read it on, but couldn't find it.--Gerroh 04:44, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

He doesn't die, he just swims to the surface after two years. Oh, is that a spoiler? /care, FFX-2 was pretty silly. Mediggo 05:57, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Noooooo you don't understand. The theory is that Tidus died during the first Sin, and everything from when Auron talks to him and they get sucked up and beyond is just him dreaming.--GerrohUser Gerroh GerrohEmblem.gif 22:19, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Sylvari images[edit]

Could you please, in the future, comment in a singular centralized location instead of both commenting in a centralized location and on several talk pages. Not only does it create unnecessary work (i.e. I have to tag the moved talk pages for deletion as well as the image pages) but it doesn't make the job get done any faster.
Also, in all the time that you took to type out that paragraph ranting about how "the images were clearly hastily uploaded to the wiki, without much consideration for where they really should go[,]" you could have been bold and moved all of them. EDIT: And no, you do not need special privileges to move pages. Aqua (T|C) 02:09, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Piss off with that "bold" shit, I didn't know about moving the pages, I check the wiki once in awhile. You've completely misunderstood my intents and reasoning. You should be asking people not to hastily upload shit, rather than be a hypocrite and give me the same fuckin lecture on two pages. Right?--Gerroh 04:52, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
It's called advice, not lecture. Mediggo 05:57, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
The tone is that of a lecture, "You could be bold". If it were just advice they'd say "You could move it yourself, by using the move tab". Regardless, it was repeated, thus making Aqua hypocritical. Don't try to make a stupid defense by diverging from the point.--Gerroh 07:28, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Userpage talk is different from article/file talk. Matters which relate to how a user makes edits or formats, or anything else directed to one particular user belong to their talk pages. Also, we're not here to lecture each other, but improve our present and future contributions. So please assume good faith and take all this as advice from fellow user. Nobody is perfect, especially when it comes to complex community project like this wiki. Mediggo 08:10, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Again, the "Lecture/advice" was repeated. It is on the Sylvari talk page, it is on my talk page. Whichever way you put it, they're still being hypocritical, so I think you should take that last paragraph to Aqua. ô_ô--GerrohUser Gerroh GerrohEmblem.gif 21:00, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Gerroh, when someone's letting you know how you can contribute, please don't lash out at them. Similarly, Aqua, please be more patient with newer users. You're both trying to improve the same thing - telling someone to piss off doesn't help that. pling User Pling sig.png 21:19, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
I didn't lash out the first time I was told. I said, quote "Dunno how, figured you need permission to do it. Oh wait, there's a move tab. Still, figured it needs to be an admin". I'd recommend you explore the full discussion/dilemma before suggesting how people react to it.--GerrohUser Gerroh GerrohEmblem.gif 01:12, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Signature and user images[edit]

Your signature image has been moved to File:User Gerroh GerrohEmblem.gif. Please redirect this image to either your userpage or your talk page. If you don't know how to do redirects, simply tell me which one you want and I'll do it for you. To reincorporate this image into your signature, simply copy paste the following code into the signature text bar option in Special:Preferences

<b>G<font color='orange'>e</font>rr<font color='orange'>o</font>h</b>[[Image:User Gerroh GerrohEmblem.gif]].

Also, on the subject of user image naming, please name all images uploaded for personal use as "File:User Gerroh <image name>.<extension>".
Cheers, Aqua (T|C) 22:05, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Right right, I forgot it had to be User:Gerroh____ --Gerroh
It's not "User:Gerroh"; it's "File:User Gerroh". They are in the file namespace, not the user namespace. Aqua (T|C) 13:23, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

(Reset indent) To reiterate, your signature icon should redirect to either your user- or talkpage. If you don't know how to do this, I can do it for you, simply tell me which one you want. Aqua (T|C) 22:18, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

But that's a lot of wooooooork and it adds a ton of code and junk to the signatuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuure. I'll do the code, I don't need people doin that for me.--GerrohUser Gerroh GerrohEmblem.gif 22:31, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Those screenshots[edit]

They're absolutely beautiful. However, whenever you upload screenshots you should always name them File:<Year> <Month> <short description>.xxx (e.g. "File:2010 August sylvari ranger.jpg"), as per this. Just a little reminder for the future :) -- orrery 11:46, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

sig image size[edit]

G'Day. I noticed that your sig image is slightly larger than it is supposed to be. Your image is currently 20px and actually should be no larger than 19px. May I suggest that you use the following code for your signature: [[File:User_Gerroh_GerrohEmblem.gif|19px|link=User:Gerroh]] Noticed that I added a size to your image without uploading a new image, and I also shortened your link. The result is this: User Gerroh GerrohEmblem.gif instead of this: User Gerroh GerrohEmblem.gif. Of course this produces a less clear image, but you are free to re-upload at 19px high if you do not like it. Cheers!! Venom20 User Venom20-icon-0602-sm-black.png 22:26, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Just popping by to mention the 19-pixel height restriction isn't arbitrary- that's the maximum height an image can span before it disrupts the line spacing of the text. Felix Omni Signature.png 22:29, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
The old sig image was just carried over from another purpose where 20x20 was needed. I replaced it with a slightly modified different picture. And I'll probably replace it again with something proper when I start to post on the wiki regularly.--GerrohUser Gerroh GerrohEmblem.gif 19:51, 27 April 2012 (UTC)