Template talk:Contains upgrade component

Would it be better to suppress results when excessive, such as Minor Rune of the Citadel (154 pieces of equiment)? We could use a note in acquisition linking to a list: Salvaging equipment with this rune

Also, I went with the list format just to display the information, because I don't see the benefit from the table (used on pages like Superior Rune of the Traveler currently). I felt most readers are going to just be looking for the equipment it comes from, not the full details about that equipment (like defense ratings and chat links). Is there a reason to use the table instead? —Mora 16:54, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Suppressing sounds good, and the tables have no benefit over this implementation. I like this template. :P Tyndel (talk) 17:19, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

That table is probably a bit excessive. However, I think that level and rarity, at least, would be helpful, because you can filter the trading post results using them. (Not everyone knows the rule that minor = masterwork, major = rare, and superior = exotic.) —Dr Ishmael 18:26, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

The table definitely strikes me as excessive (honest it wasn't me editing as an IP guv). Possible format:

•  Commissar's Manifesto (exotic, level 80)
•  Emerald Mithril Amulet (rare, level 80)
•  Emerald Mithril Earring (rare, level 80)
•  Emerald Mithril Ring (rare, level 80)

I don't like the rarities in bold or coloured in the midst of the list so I've left them plain...

also @ishmael, Penetrating Black Earth Aquabreather of the Citadel (light) (rare) uses a minor rune -_- -Chieftain Alex 21:40, 1 August 2015 (UTC)