User talk:Noxx/Skill Infobox Draft

→ See User talk:Loquay/Skill Infobox Draft/Version 2.

An infobox that is concise, well done. Here are my thoughts. Style=3/10, GWW style, it's old and boring. Time to revamp things, sorry. Information=9/10, I like how everything you need it there. I think that having a level requirement as you have done is a excellent idea. I agree with one of your statements, the GWW skill indication should probably stay as trivia. I think your link to lists is a good idea s well. Perhaps in replacement of the GWW indicator, there could be something in regards to a trait? Venom20 12:22, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

I am slowly trying to create more designs, this is like the "very basic one". Anyway, thanks for your opinion. ^^ · LOQUAY · 12:25, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

I don't quite understand the mechanics as of yet, but I was told that energy may scale with level. don't know if that helps or not. Venom20 14:42, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Hmm... I haven't thought about that... · LOQUAY · 14:49, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Anything made isn't set in stone: this is a wiki. If something is better now, use it and worry about changes later. —ǥrɩɳsɧƴɖɩđđɭɘş 23:16, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Constructive Criticism

Very subtle hints you edited in there, so here we go: I prefer V2 over V1 for various reasons.

V1 is nice, but too plain and it only works on GWW because of the tango as background. Maybe if we add the tangos for GW2W in there as backgrounds, version 1 would look quite right, but this is not yet the case. A point of interest would be colour coding if there's not going to be tangos, but I know there's icons for every profession so we can scratch that trail of thought already. At the moment it simply looks to plain, which I believe does not necessarily add to professionality. I do enjoy that you tried out the old style instead of disregarding it as a whole.

As for V2, I must say I can truly get used to seeing that around. It's compact, encompassing and to the point. The colours in it are limited, which in turn adds to the vividness of the design. There's not much centering issues there, as it doesn't look amateuristic (as long as the list under the profession isn't extended). The fact that you document so much more information in such a compact box, without making it look messy is a definite thumbs-up worth. I have no insight in how Energy documenting works, but I can tell there's still room for that.

Also, I specified my vote would go out to V2 if it came to that. - Infinite - talk 16:52, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

V2 should have the required level as well. - Lucian Shadowborn 21:00, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Template:Skill tier might replace that, though. - Infinite - talk 21:21, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Only issue I have with it is the non-uniform width. Just bothers me for some reason. Otherwise, looks good. —ǥrɩɳsɧƴɖɩđđɭɘş 23:29, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Version 2

Looks good to me. Nice work! ShadowRunner 14:57, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Version 3

I love version 3, it has the best format, it just needs profession colours. - 70.29.127.79 18:55, 3 April 2011 (UTC)