Guild Wars 2 Wiki talk:Requests for adminship/Pling

Er, is the candidate himself supposed to provide any sort of rationale? 01:54, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

In general for RfAs, yeah. But it doesn't seem as relevant for someone who is already a sysop. A F K When Needed 02:59, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate

What did you learn about the two old communities with the R.Phalange incident and how has that shaped how you view and interact with GW2W? --JonTheMon 21:11, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

It was so long ago that I can't give you an answer other than it probably helped me recognise/deal with trolls better. pling 21:27, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

So...

This one started more than 2 weeks ago, and has had no additional discussion for a couple days. Maybe it's time to close it, too? Erasculio 22:03, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure they're all ready to be closed. Aqua (T|C) 23:27, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

yeah, just that the rest aren't as clear cut. It's not like 100% support as with tanetris. Some are 90% support 10% oppose, others are flipped on those numbers. Still it should be clear enough that the admins can sort it out w/o controversy. --Lania 23:39, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

The consensus of this reconfirmation is that Pling is a trustworthy user who should retain usage of both sysop and bcrat tools. We should formalize this soon. --JonTheMon 13:48, 19 April 2012 (UTC)