User talk:Aquadrizzt/Sandbox/GW2W:Helper Page

Archive

---

• 2010 •

Activity Level Formatting

Assuming we're going with this general layout, only with variable activity level formats (all activity dots are on the left): here are four possible variations.

1. No bullets, sorted by alphabet (demonstrated in Top Left)
2. Bullets, sorted by alphabet (demonstrated in Top Right)
3. No bullets, sorted by activity level and then alphabet (i.e. all actives listed alphabetically, then all semi actives, etc.) (demonstrated in Bottom Left)
4. Bullets, sorted by activity level and then alphabet (demonstrated in Bottom Right)
   

Aquadrizzt (talk)(contribs) 18:49, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Well, I like the dots. It doesn't seem sorted the way you say though. --ஸ Kyoshi 18:52, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

That is likely because it's being worked on atm. :) - Infinite - talk 18:58, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Yep ^.^ Aquadrizzt (talk)(contribs) 18:59, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

I am impatient and you declared something was as described when it was not. :< --ஸ Kyoshi 19:02, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

(Reset indent) It has been completed... Aquadrizzt (talk)(contribs) 19:18, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Definitely prefer sorting by activity first. Dunno about bullet points. --ஸ Kyoshi 19:21, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

I like the bullet points; just needs a key. ShadowRunner 19:28, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Working on it ^.^ Aquadrizzt (talk)(contribs) 19:35, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Key background mismatches general theme of the page. In my personal opinion you should merely list everyone with the activity bullet, rather than also sorting us all with both normal bullets. Also, I believe we have met consensus on the nationality flags. Maybe it would be high time we upgraded the wiki helper page with at least the flags, in the very least, ye? - Infinite - talk 15:03, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Key background is temporary...feel free to edit that. The bullets are something I'm still undecided on, and we should definitely sort people by section (or atleast, find a way to indicate which sections they can work in). Aquadrizzt (talk)(contribs) 02:38, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Any opinions on my little sneak edit to the listing on the bottom two? :P - Infinite - talk 15:53, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

(Reset indent) Bottom left is way to spaced, though I don't mind the one on the bottom right. Aquadrizzt (talk)(contribs) 04:04, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Collapsible Table w/in Table

(in the actual version) If anyone knows how to make the list on the right collapsible, please feel free to edit. Also feel free to edit if you want to update your information. Aquadrizzt (talk)(contribs) 05:47, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Bah, I just had a go and can't figure it out. ShadowRunner 13:38, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Dito, mine didnt work either.--Neil • 13:39, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

I almost got it right, shouldn't be long now. - Infinite - talk 15:33, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Infinite...if you can solve it...you get a cookie. I spent literally two hours fighting with it last night Aquadrizzt (talk)(contribs) 15:49, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

The last problem with it in my preview is that I can't get the expandable to align at the top, next to the categories. If you want to see what I mean, I could save it for you. - Infinite - talk 15:55, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

I think i might be able to help, mind saving where your at so i can have a nose, infinite? --Neil • 15:57, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

I even shouted in IRC for help, but this is as far as I got so far. :D - Infinite - talk 15:58, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

I somehow ended up making the entire thing go pewpew, so im not trying that again. I think its fine after your edit. --Neil • 16:23, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

There's one thing that needs to happen still; fixing the position of the expandable to the top of the table, and have it expand downwards. :D - Infinite - talk 16:31, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

I know, thats what i tried >_> --Neil • 16:36, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

It's probably going to end up being so simple we can't believe we couldn't think of it ourselves. - Infinite - talk 16:39, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Just like that last edit i did to my userpage?--Neil • 16:45, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Does the expandable table need to go on the right of the other tables? Or can it go underneath. Venom20 16:55, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

At one point (before i crashed and burned) i did try it at the bottom, but it looked too spacey. so i decided not to. --Neil • 16:59, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

(Reset indent) Thanks Infinite and Neil. @Venom20: I tried it, it would make the page like four times longer than it already is. Aquadrizzt (talk)(contribs) 17:01, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

spacey? Have you seen it on the side? lol. I have it opening downwards on the right hand side but I've moved the box to top. unsure if it needs to stay in the middle. Thoughts? Venom20 17:04, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

-is still going through trial and error- - Infinite - talk 17:05, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Venom...that is exactly what I (and probably Neil and Infinite) were thinking. Aquadrizzt (talk)(contribs) 17:11, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

And why does that work for Venom but not me?! -spas- - Infinite - talk 17:11, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

I dabbled in the black arts? Venom20 17:14, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Don't we all. ^.^ So, should we update the helper page, or should we present it (for the millionth time) on the actual Helper talk page, and then see what people think? Aquadrizzt (talk)(contribs) 17:15, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Anyway, that's that then. Let's put it on the helper talk page and wait and see. - Infinite - talk 17:16, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

I don't see why not. And ehrm... I got a table within a table on my userspace 4 months ago... can I get a cookie? ge4ce 17:20, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

(Reset indent) Cookies and promotions for everyone! And while we wait for consensus to be reached, we can start assessing activity levels with talk page messages. Aquadrizzt (talk)(contribs) 17:21, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

How it felt. - Infinite - talk 18:31, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

lol, nice Venom20 19:23, 9 January 2011 (UTC)