Talk:Attend the Party

The page shouldn't be deleted, but instead replaced with a redirect to the appropriate page. Achievments are a common search term. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.138.65.201 (talk) at 02:39, 28 October 2012 (UTC).

I agree with the above - because 'attend the party' is exactly how I got here. Redirects are making best use of the technology. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Stormdancer (talk • contribs) at 00:03, 29 October 2012 (UTC).

I, too, agree, but where should it redirect? I am still not clear on how to get the achievement. 198.228.216.158 19:09, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Thats the problem, this is a page made for unreleased content, which will probably be coming out the 31st. Xslare 00:21, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

exactly so just wait untill the acheivement is obtainable and then it needs to be decided if ti shoud be moved/deleted naloj 08:51, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Redirected to Special Event where I just added how to get it. —Dr Ishmael 12:50, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

so basicly you just ignored what was discussed here and did what you wantend. i am not saying it was a bad decision but it makes the whole discussion thing rather pointless id you just do without holding regard to what was said.naloj 15:36, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

He provided a change that was better than the content-less page we had in place, and it's not like he ignored what was posted here (he could've deleted the page after all...). If there's a better solution to be had then certainly continue discussion. Personally, I'm fine with what was done. This is a relatively simple achievement that likely doesn't need its own page dedicated to it. — Burfo 16:05, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

I followed what was suggested in the first post and redirected this to an "appropriate page" where the details are given. All you have to do is visit LA in a certain time window. Putting that single line of text in its own article here would be pointless. —Dr Ishmael 16:13, 31 October 2012 (UTC)