File talk:Human Nightmare armor render.jpg
From Guild Wars 2 Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
I like this design and can't wait for the discussions about the female armor being too revealing :P --
The Holy Dragons 12:06, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- How sexist not to talk about the over-exposure of male nudity. Will you just look at that breast of his. - Infinite - talk 14:00, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- Plate armor. Yes. Nothing more. Thats all. -- Cyan
14:29, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- Just for you Holy: That armor reveals too much! Obviously, our heavy armor guys must be living tanks with not a centimeter of flesh exposed! On a serious matter - people make that complaint due to the difference in male and female and/or how the reveal is not exactly for design purposes (which, imo, it is for this case - sometimes a lack of armor can lead to intimidation *cough "No Helm" bio option cough*). Konig/talk 21:36, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
for you Konig :p --
The Holy Dragons 13:34, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
- What? No box of chocolates? This is Halloween, not some silly festival of hearts named after a dead guy no one cares about. I WANT MY CANDY AND JOKES. Konig/talk 15:18, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
- (open the it's a box of chocs ) --The Holy Dragons 15:47, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
... Liar! There's nothing inside! Q_Q Konig/talk 21:52, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
- At least the armour is aptly named; it really looks like a nightmare (not sure if it's a good "gorgeous" nightmare, or just one filled with shame and agony). That being said, come with me Konig. I have plenty of candy for you! It's all here in this unmarked white van! ~opens door~ 136.159.70.30 23:41, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
- The male armor is less revealing than the female, but that's not actually my main complaint this time. The male version is way more badass. It's got torn mail, chains, and spikier gloves. The female version is too dainty (of course, if they didn't have so much skin showing, they could've fit more stuff onto it...) and fishnets, really? The female helmet is cool though, I could see myself wearing that with some other set. Arshay Duskbrow 00:39, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
- At least the armour is aptly named; it really looks like a nightmare (not sure if it's a good "gorgeous" nightmare, or just one filled with shame and agony). That being said, come with me Konig. I have plenty of candy for you! It's all here in this unmarked white van! ~opens door~ 136.159.70.30 23:41, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
- (open the
- What? No box of chocolates? This is Halloween, not some silly festival of hearts named after a dead guy no one cares about. I WANT MY CANDY AND JOKES. Konig/talk 15:18, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
- Just for you Holy: That armor reveals too much! Obviously, our heavy armor guys must be living tanks with not a centimeter of flesh exposed! On a serious matter - people make that complaint due to the difference in male and female and/or how the reveal is not exactly for design purposes (which, imo, it is for this case - sometimes a lack of armor can lead to intimidation *cough "No Helm" bio option cough*). Konig/talk 21:36, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- Plate armor. Yes. Nothing more. Thats all. -- Cyan
I see i see what you do not see[edit]
And it is a bunch of Obsidian armors put in a blender. DemonicFahrir
15:40, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
- lol I don't see it at all xD I do see primeval-like (or maybe luxon) boots on the female version though.. also isn't this the strategely placed bitss of skin armor? --The Holy Dragons 15:46, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
