Talk:Conjure Lightning Hammer

Let's take bets on who will be the first user to turn this into a "This user rocks" userbox... Aqua (T|C) 01:27, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

This user rocks.

I win Venom20 01:32, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

You, sir, are no fun. Aqua (T|C) 02:47, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

But I won the bet. Venom20 04:09, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Five minutes :0 --Xu Davella 05:27, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

It reminded me of Spiderman :D --Mann 15:07, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

"It summons a   Lightning Hammer, with a lightning storm skill, a   leap skill, a skill that creates a static field and a wind blast skill." At least we have those two, it that considered enough evidence? Aqua (T|C) 23:15, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Love the hammer

I love this hammer. I used 1 skill for running, another for jumping puzzles, a third for amazking knockbacks on cattle.... Torrenal 05:08, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Not "eh, close enough"

Based on the finicky behaviour I have seen regarding certain minor posts... I feel it is inappropiate to link "Conjure Lightning Hammer" to "Lightning Hammer".

• There is a whole word difference.
• Doing a search on GWW for "Conjure Lightning Hammer" will yeild no results.
• If a GW2 skill name was the same, except for spelling, that would be "close enough".
• >> Eg. IF the GW2 skill was named "Shield of judgEment", that would be acceptable to link to GWW "Shield of Judgment".

Meh... while I am going on record, that the link should be removed because it is not the "same name" as this skill... I am doing a manual work around to change the Trivia to, "A Guild Wars skill bears a similar name to this skill."  Frostty1 18:30, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Removed due to the same link being on Lightning Hammer. - Infinite - talk 18:37, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Uhh... yeah, that's what I said :-) (Thanks) Frostty1  22:08, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

You are encouraged to be bold on GW2W. You've shown enough reflective ability to actually make edits like these yourself. ;) When in doubt you can still ask for feedback on talk pages like you did here. In the event it goes wrong, anyone can revert the edit (including yourself), so direct harm is easily fixed.

This applies to anyone who leaves comments as clear and logical as your own, by the way. - Infinite - talk 22:14, 7 June 2012 (UTC)