File talk:Centaur Raiders concept art.jpg

On left, he Dual Wielding 1hander Axes--Knighthonor 16:35, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Unless you are Anet staff.Stfu refering to WoW --Neil2250 , The Zoologist 15:56, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Dual wielding refers to WoW now? Jesus Christ you're stupid. - Mini Me talk 16:14, 16 March 2010

It wasn't dual-handing in particular that caused Neil to comment that. Knight here has been commenting on all concept art how everything in GW2 is going to be/should going to be like in WoW. I think he got banned, though. - Infinite - talk 16:25, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Awww :( - Mini Me talk 16:27, 16 March 2010

He did get banned, and every post here and on GW2Guru has basically been him wanting GW2 to be a free WoW - he even contradicted himself by saying that to succeed it should be a WoW-clone and in the next post (and even once in the very same post) went on to say how copies of WoW all fail. -- Konig/talk 16:33, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Yeah... I mean, KH seemed rather creative, but he needed to branch out farther than within the realm of WoW's ideology. He kept insisting upon things that WoW had, and even admitted to wanting GW to be like WoW, only free. :( --Amannelle 18:19, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Lame.

Sorry Neil. - Mini Me talk 20:22, 16 March 2010

About the centaur with the 2 axes: This is probably how aspects of the assassin will be incorporated into the new system. Possibly we won't be limited to daggers when it comes to being able to have a weapon in each hand. And also notice the size of the axes. They're even smaller than most axes in GW1, except for the Eaglecrest Axe. Dual Wielding, Two-Weapon Fighting, Dual Weapon Strike (made that one up), however you want to call it, I think it's just awesome that we'll be able to do it, if the concept art is to be believed, that is.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ravencroft0 (talk • contribs).

I don't know, there's a lot of things in concept art that never get implemented in-game. That would be cool, though. -~=Ϛρѧякγ (τѧιк) 23:48, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

My bad about the Eaglecrest Axe. Apparently it's actually a very large axe. Didn't read the item details on the main page for it. Oh well. --Ravencroft0 06:09, 6 April 2010 (UTC)