File talk:NewKrytan.jpg

I'm not sure your 'sign' in the bottom is appropriate. If it was for userspace use, yes, but on a main article I'd change that. --Odal talk 17:06, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

k, ill remove. i totally forgot about the upload thing that basicly had my name in it ;) --Neil • 17:07, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

:D --Odal talk 17:11, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

this might give some more accurate depictions for some of those characters. Awesome job of it, though. ,,"Klumpeet",, 17:12, 22 June 2010 (UTC) *edit corrected link ,,"Klumpeet",, 17:13, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Errr, is it just me or is the sign still there? --Odal talk 17:17, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

But it's not on the New Krytan article... *confused* --Odal talk 17:18, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Image

I prefer the old version, the homemade version looks kinda cheap. -- Cyan 17:39, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

/Cry... Meany.. and i spend so much time..--Neil • 17:44, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

I'm trying to do something like this, but in Fireworks :3. However I can't be bothered at the moment... So I'll finish it later xD --Naut 17:48, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

well.mines alright till naut finishes his.--Neil • 17:52, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Could you please stop the weird interpunction? My eyes hurt. -- Cyan 17:55, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Excuse me? O.o--Neil • 18:00, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but the new version is off (no offense Neil, it looks like a little child's doodles - then again, I'm terrible at paint myself, if that's what you did) and simply shouldn't be done like this. Like I said elsewhere, I prefer that we upload individual letters and do as per the Old Canthan table here. -- Konig/talk 20:19, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

This newest version not only hurts my eyes, but emits a frequency that hurts my ears as well. A bright white background, coupled with shining white characters that glow and seem to mash together is hardly an example of an alphabet. Comparing Neil's version to this, Neil is now Picasso. Please re-revert this. Eive 20:03, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

I put the old version up because half of Neil's "letters" were wrong. It would be best to have nothing over what neil made (no offense neil), as it would be inaccurate information. -- Konig/talk 22:28, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Perspective

The perspective is incorrect for most glyphs. You should base your drawings on an image where the perspective is corrected like this. For example, the lines of the O glyph are supposed to be perfectly horizontal. Chriskang 17:56, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Once again.we wait till Naut finishes his.its bound to better than mine ;)--Neil • 18:00, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

:L, Thanks XD. Also Chris, Thanks for that. It really does help trying to get as close as possible to the real image :) --Naut 18:08, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

svg

Here's the first batch:

• 

  G

• 

  H

• 

  I

• 

  N

• 

  O

• 

  P

• 

  S

• 

  T

• 

  U

In case you're not aware of it, this wiki allows you to upload svg but displays them wrong. This is a long lasting problem that has never been solved. Meanwhile, I'm uploading the images as png. If someone wants the vectorized sources (to edit them), let me now and I'll upload a zip somewhere. Chriskang 00:57, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Second batch coming tomorrow ;) Chriskang 00:58, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Love 'em. Nice work. :D -- Aspectacle  01:15, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

These are great - just what we need, but would it be possible to give them a transparent background so they can be used in a more versatile way? ,,"Klumpeet",, 06:32, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Then they'de be all jagged, you cant make something transparent that has a smoothing effect on it without making it jagged (without alot of work, i mean).--Neil • 14:45, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Added transparent background and 7 new glyphs. See the category for a gallery. I don't think I can do more for now. Other glyphs are too blurred and/or don't have enough occurrence to create a clean image of them. Chriskang 17:17, 24 June 2010 (UTC)