User talk:95.166.29.218

From Guild Wars 2 Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

unnecessary[edit]

There's no reason to add that list to every single ascended weapon page. It's common knowledge that all the ascended weapons have the same skin, just with different colors. —Dr Ishmael User Dr ishmael Diablo the chicken.png 14:20, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

I disagree. I wouldn't say it's common knowledge at all, but I do agree that it could be done more elegantly than a list. Maybe a navbar? I just lack the knowledge of how it's preferred within the community, but I do think it's necessary 95.166.29.218 14:23, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
We already have the navbox linking to the stat set, and the set page has a link at the top to the ascended weapon page, which clearly explains the relationship. —Dr Ishmael User Dr ishmael Diablo the chicken.png 14:26, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
(Edit conflict) It's not common knowledge because I didn't know it and I'm pretty common. I don't think a list of every other ascended weapon on every page is necessary though. Maybe just "This weapon shares a skin with other crafted Ascended greatswords." Felix Omni Signature.png 14:28, 25 September 2013 (UTC)


The navbox linking to the stat set isn't what we're discussing here, so mentioning it is pointless. What might be "clear" to you isn't clear to everyone. Same as with the "common knowledge" 95.166.29.218 14:32, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
I'm content with what Felix suggest, but still would be nice to help people explore their choices more easily, for both skin and stats. 95.166.29.218 14:33, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
"This weapon shares a skin with other crafted Ascended greatswords." But they do not. They have the same model, but textures differ quite a lot. In World of Warcraft's database there was a field "this item shares model with ... items", maybe implement something like this? MalGalad 14:43, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
I would support this. Though I have no other suggestions than a list or navbox... 95.166.29.218 14:45, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Would pointing back to the [[Ascended Spire]] page be sufficient (if there was a gallery on that page)? --JonTheMon (talk) 14:53, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Yep, that would be perfect in my opinion 95.166.29.218 14:54, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Thoughts on [[Talk:Ascended_Spire#gallery]]? --JonTheMon (talk) 16:24, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it.

We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify him/her. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.