Talk:Flameseeker Prophecies

Is this really necessary? Furthermore, does the licensing allow for this? --Santax (talk · contribs) 09:36, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

While this is what happened in GW1, it is part of history and lore in GW2. For now at least it should stay IMO. Van Harl 12:03, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

The Flameseeker Prophecies were fulfilled 250 years prior to the start of Guild Wars 2. They are not in the least bit relevant. --Santax (talk · contribs) 15:58, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

As for relevance, we don't know if they or the events in them will have any significance in GW2, so too early for that. As for licensing, depends on where it's copied from. If it's from guildwiki, then no, if it's from GWW, then yes, assuming the edit summary points out the source. Backsword 12:55, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

I doubt it will be anything more than a reference in Guild Wars 2. In that case, it should be a simple interwiki link, not an article. -- br12 • (talk) • 15:55, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

yet again, i /agree with brains.. ^Teo^ 22:56, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Copied from GuildWiki. EDIT: It's from ArenaNet, as GWW and GW have the exact same text. Calor (t) 23:09, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

How do we know they were fulfilled? We never heard what was in them. -- Armond Warblade 08:05, 18 February 2008 (UTC)