User talk:Xeeron

From Guild Wars 2 Wiki

Lmao, nice page. Was thinking the same, but bought my Dell in July. Love it :D Calor — talk 23:31, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, my current one is getting old and has had some minor bugs for a while now, but I would hate to buy a new computer that I'll be stuck with for some years and find out that it just meets the minimum GW2 requirements half a year later ... --Xeeron 23:35, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Hah, I have thesame problem, except that my computer just IS old and is experiencing major bugs. Sometimes it flings up the camera in the loading screen, and shos my char as a white block if I manage to get the camrea down ;). I suppose a lot of people have the computer spec problem? (Luckily, other games I'm waiting for aren't for the computer (nor are they many..) :D) --- -- (s)talkpage 23:38, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

My computer owns!, getting a new one for xmas though.. Its gonna be good --Warwick

Uhhh, Windows95. I suddenly feel winter got a bit colder by thinking about that one, hehe. --Xeeron 14:50, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Im getting a Good One for christmas! --Warwick

[edit] Somthing I'd like to ask about

Did you notice Poke using his SysOp powers to delete some pages? Backsword 21:20, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

He deleted color templates, and a few others. We do not know for sure GW2 will contain those professions (although I doubt they'll scrap, say, the Warrior or Elementalist :P) wich is why Poke deleted em. --- -- (s)talkpage 21:26, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

they cant take away the mesmer :( then im outa here --Cursed Angel 22:18, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Soo...how long until we substitute races for professions in userboxes. This user is an Asura by nature (with a little Pic of Vekk here.) Calor — talk 22:22, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

im a charr mesmer by nature --Cursed Angel 22:24, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Speaking of userboxes pics, are we going to upload skill icons, like Guilt and all that, or not? --- Raptors / RAAAAAAAAAA!

No, unless it's in Guild Wars 2. But I'm sure you could upload your own personal version. -- br12 • (talk) • 00:00, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Addressing the question which I guess is behind this (should poke delete pages?), all I can say is: Currently we have zero established policies. That means everyone, users, sysops and bureaucrats is acting in a grey zone. I can only urge everyone to try to be even a bit more conscious how their actions are percieved by others and at the same time also to be a bit more forgiving.

If a sysop does something clearly horrible (not talking about deleting templates here), I am sure that you can go to any bureaucrat to reign the sysop in. However that I am confident and hopeful that it will never come to that.

To come back to the initial question, no I did not, but then I clicked on my talk before clicking on recent changes. =) --Xeeron 22:38, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Ah. No, the underlying question was really:Did a bcrat see it and choose not to do anything about it, or has it simply not been observed yet. Now I see it used to be the latter. But with your comment, it's now the former.

Which is interesting from a purely theoretical perspective. Backsword 23:55, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

If you have a problem with me deleting those pages, why don't you simply say something? Creating templates for colors for professions which may not even exist in GW2 (this wiki is about GW2) is not helpful at all. And as we don't have a deletion policy, there is also no need to wait 3 days..

And as long as we do not know anything about GW2, I think we should not use GW(1) content here.. poke | talk 00:06, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Poke, don't take it personally, it's not really about your actions. (I was the first one to suggest their deletion, see user talk:yo#note.) It's actually Xeeron the bcrat who's interesting here. You just happened to be the first sysop to be in action. Backsword 00:12, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Grandfathered sysops

They missed me when they grandfathered the other admins, could you promote me? -- Gordon Ecker 03:50, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

This will be interesting. Backsword 11:46, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Tut..tut..tut. Shame on Anet -- br12 • (talk) • 16:38, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Dropping a hint, ANet? Nah, just kidding. Gordon deserves the readminship. Calor (t) 17:31, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

It's done. -- Gordon Ecker 10:39, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

It seems obvious to me that ANet intended to carry over all GWW admins and simply left out Gordon by mistake, as such I would have promoted him had I not been in skiing holidays. --Xeeron 13:49, 5 January 2008 (UTC)