Talk:Fire Grab

Doesn't the recharge seem a little ridiculous? Spotina ~Talk 12:06, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Seeing as how numerous kids have complained about the burst damage thieves can deal out... No. This skill is oriented in the same manner - To let elementalists nuke someone's face off. Can't have that repeated more then twice a minute. --JunBerry 04:31, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

One too many Damage links?

Should "Damage vs. Burning: 1,726" be unlinked?   Frostty1 00:07, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Yes, correct. This is called overlinking; where more than just the first instance of a term is linked to. Overlinking is something the wiki likes to avoid as much as possible. Not only that particular link should be unlinked, also the one directly above it because there is already a link to damage in the description. - Infinite - talk 00:41, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

EDIT: Although the template listing those effects automatically turns the second damage into a link. Because of this, I've unlinked the very first instance of the word "damage" instead. - Infinite - talk 00:43, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Skill descriptions and effects are a special case because in skill list pages, only the description is given. Thus, everything that can be linked, must be linked in the description. At least, that's how the argument goes, and I generally agree. If anything, I'd say we remove the links from the effect templates. —Dr Ishmael 00:48, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

That is something I agree with completely. I find those automated links quite a nuisance. - Infinite - talk 00:49, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Continuation of this discussion moved here. —Dr Ishmael 01:14, 6 June 2012 (UTC)